Web Video Producers: We're Pretty Sure There's A Business Here, Somewhere

|

youtube-dog-bubble.jpgCan anybody make any money in Web video? This is a recurring question for us, one we've been asking in different forms for much of the last year. Today's answer, via Web analytics firm TubeMogul: Yes, maybe.

We asked TubeMogul how many of its users -- video producers who want to see how their work is performing on mulitple platforms -- are actively trying to make a buck -- or a few pennies. So TubeMogul asked them, via a survey of 12,000 of its users.

The results: 51% are trying to make money from the video views they generate, and they're not doing a terrible job at it either. Tubemogul's users report that advertisers are paying an average CPM of $12 -- that is, $12 for every1,000 views.

What about the other half of users, who aren't trying to sell any ads or sponsorships at all? TubeMogul is wondering the same thing:

Worth pondering are the 48.4% surveyed that do not monetize their videos at all, despite
ubiquitous revenue-sharing programs that are easy and costless to join. Many of these
people commented that their videosareads (i.e. movie previews or corporate-seeded viral
videos), or they are putting out their content for fun (i.e. family videos).

The TubeMogul study is certainly not scientific, so there are plenty of caveats here: The numbers are self-reported. The reported CPMs don't cleanly translate into revenue for the producers, since in most cases they're sharing the dollars (or pennies) with video hosting sites like YouTube. Also, as TubeMogul points out, there seem to have been some reading comprehension issues: "some of those surveyed were confused about terms like "monetization" and "CPM," jargon that is more esoteric than we assumed."

Still, this industry is still very nascent. We'll take incomplete and/or flawed data in lieu of no data at all.

 


TubeMogul Web Video study - Free Legal Forms



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

20 Comments

Hehateme said:
You need a Blairwitch Project type hit to make money from web. People don't stop working a 7eleven.

IMHO said:
The study notes that comprehension may have been low because CPM is an esoteric term. Don't you think you should have defined that in your article. Good practice is to define any acronym that isn't painfully obvious (i.e, USA, EPA, NASA) the first time it is used.

marshall kirkpatrick (URL) said:
presumably those unfamiliar with the terms would pull the avg down even lower if they reported. i always think of pirillo, who is making bank, when i think of this issue. any data is good here though, agreed

Brennan (URL) said:
You talk about Web Video Producers and Web Video but it seems like you're discussion is excluding producers of marketing or advertising video content.

These types of web video producers make money by selling video production as well as other services that go along with putting video on the internet e.g. video content management systems, tracking capabilities, distribution capabilities, etc.

I noticed a similar bias in an eMarketer article: http://blog.cantaloupe.tv/blog/marketing-with-internet-video/0/0/excluding-advertising-or-marketing-video-content

Brennan, you're absolutely right: All sorts of interesting opportunities providing services to the video boom. Like TubeMogul! The video production business itself seems less likely to boom, since it's capital intensive and doesn't seem to have much in the way of scaling opportunities. The other infrastructure stuff you mention does seem very appealing -- assuming that there are enough video producers, sites and advertisers to take advantage of them.

Don MacAskill (URL) said:
We're making money in web video. ;)

Dave said:
I call BS - why stop at a $12 CPM, why not say $30? Ultimately none of that really matters as it is all about eCPM (effective CPM). Once you account for unpurchased inventory the number goes down dramatically.

Examples:

MySpace - eCPM $.37
Facebook - eCPM $.10

Boom goes the dynamite.

Dave, you're absolutely correct about the value of eCPM to publishers. For content creators, I'd argue that the most relevant number if RPM (revenue per thousand). But see the notes above - terminology was already problematic with this survey. It's a benchmark, nothing more or less.

Charbax (URL) said:
Consider a scenario where Google manages to put overlay ads on 5 billion views per month (% of overall Youtube content produced by producers who want to use overlay ads would increase once monetization increases).

At $15 CPM that amounts to $75 in revenue per month. $900 million in revenue per year. That would be of the share going to the content producers. While Google may take an even larger revenue from this.

With $900 million per year going to Youtube content creators, that makes a huge industry for more and better videos to be published on Youtube and monetized this way. This makes it possible to afford the production of longer, better more monetizable videos, which will increase the amount of views.

Eric Rice (URL) said:
A different question: Is there money in video? Web Video is a type of delivery method. South Park does web video, yet we wouldn't question their revenue-making ability. :) This is a problem that I believe is what made podcast monetization so difficult-- looking at the deliverr method as the medium, instead of a method.

Are those that make money in 'web video' part of a bigger media package-- those that might do video in other formats, as well as text, audio and photography combined?

Lisa Feeley (URL) said:
I completely agree Brennan as there are very few of us who are 100% monetized professional video producers with a web site to help those clients who are seeking professional video marketing of their products/services (others call in advertising but we don't). We too are making money but our model is the long tail approach not the typical very costly approach of producing a 1 - 3 minute video. What we offer is very scalable. So, I think it has been a challenge to track the real figures as there is too much confusion and everyone is mostly considering only the 30 second spots as ads.

Lisa

wow gold (URL) said:
buy WOW GOld .We supply cheap wow GoLd,to reliable customers. welcome to
WOw golD buy woW gOld,sell wOw Gold
Please look here WOw gold,Cheap wow gold,WOw GOld,
buy woW goLD,Cheap WoW gold Power Leveling, World of Warcraft
WOw gold.


wow gold (URL) said:
Life is always full of surprises! We now provide you with the wow gold, here are the most comprehensive in the wow power leveling, the fastest world of warcraft gold, we intention to provide you with cheapest wow gold services, because we entertainment in the same warcraft gold! wow gold has been waiting for you!

tewrq (URL) said:
Written in a very wonderful ah, we provide all world of warcraft goldservices. for the precise analysis of wins, you can buy world of warcraft gold cheap world of warcraft gold here ! I think there will be many people concerned about this article, we provide all wow goldservices.and look forward to an equally exciting you can buy world of warcraft gold cheap wow gold here ! under the emergence of hope not waited too long

dillon (URL) said:
Web Video Producers: We're Pretty Sure There's A Business Here, Somewhere350-030I have no choice. You win.

emory (URL) said:
640-802 Don't blow it. (It's )Up to you.

John Smith said:
The premier seller of air jordans and buy jordans and information on acne.

klingeltöne said:
Thanks, greate and useful article
good job!
Bei uns finden Sie über 50.000 Real Klingeltöne, Polyphone, Video Klingeltöne,Handy Logos, Handy Spiele, Handy Programme...Sie können die aktuellsten Klingeltöne auf Ihr Handy per sms herunterlden.
klingeltöne
handy spiele
handy videos
video klingeltöne
freizeichentöne
Handy Themen


Join the discussion