Latest Boneheaded Yahoo Move: Miscounted Proxy Votes**

|

Picture 16.pngIf Yahoo weren't flailing in other aspects of its business, conspiracy theorists might have a leg to stand on: CEO Jerry Yang "disappeared" millions of proxy votes against him so as to maintain his throttle-hold on the company.

Alas, it was just another ham-fisted screw-up.

Yahoo's proxy firm Broadridge miscounted the votes. As we noted yesterday, the new count doesn't change anything--except give Jerry and Roy Bostock less shareholder support than they thought.

*UPDATE: Yahoo says the fault was entirely Broadridge's (or the voters) and says Broadridge works for banks, brokers, and institutions, not Yahoo. Translation: Don't blame us. WSJ:

In a statement Monday, Yahoo said it accurately announced the certified results. The company "did not participate in the execution of the votes and was not a party to any errors which may have been made either by a voting institution or a proxy processing intermediary acting on behalf of banks, brokers and institutions," the statement read.

UPDATE 2: Here are the new numbers. Only 66% of shareholders voted to keep Jerry.  Still a comfortable margin, but far from overwhelming. Icahn and his friends might actually have been able to get him fired!

Yahoo! Inc. (Nasdaq:YHOO - News) was informed today by Corporate Election Services, the inspector of elections for the Yahoo! annual meeting of shareholders on August 1, 2008, that Corporate Election Services was notified this morning by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., an independent voting intermediary that processes proxies on behalf of banks, brokers and institutions, of errors made by Broadridge in reporting votes at the meeting. Specifically, as Broadridge publicly disclosed earlier today, when Broadridge reported voting results for withholds, a truncation error occurred in reporting share numbers that exceeded eight digits.

The following table reflects the corrected Broadridge numbers:
 
Director   Shares For   % For   Shares Withheld   % Withheld
Roy J. Bostock 632,023,657 60.4% 414,071,927 39.6%
Ronald W. Burkle 649,373,291 62.1% 396,722,293 37.9%
Eric Hippeau 948,862,579 90.7% 97,233,005 9.3%
Vyomesh Joshi 971,594,650 92.9% 74,500,934 7.1%
Arthur H. Kern 714,871,925 68.3% 331,223,659 31.7%
Robert A. Kotick 967,044,818 92.4% 79,050,766 7.6%
Mary Agnes Wilderotter 964,939,727 92.2% 81,155,857 7.8%
Gary L. Wilson 756,006,576 72.3% 290,089,008 27.7%
Jerry Yang 693,055,602 66.3% 353,039,982 33.7%
 
The following table shows the original voting results certified by the inspector of elections, as previously reported:
 
Director Shares For % For Shares Withheld % Withheld
Roy J. Bostock 832,023,657 79.5% 214,071,927 20.5%
Ronald W. Burkle 849,373,291 81.2% 196,722,293 18.8%
Eric Hippeau 948,862,579 90.7% 97,233,005 9.3%
Vyomesh Joshi 971,594,650 92.9% 74,500,934 7.1%
Arthur H. Kern 814,871,925 77.9% 231,223,659 22.1%
Robert A. Kotick 967,044,818 92.4% 79,050,766 7.6%
Mary Agnes Wilderotter 964,939,727 92.2% 81,155,857 7.8%
Gary L. Wilson 856,006,576 81.8% 190,089,008 18.2%
Jerry Yang 893,055,602 85.4% 153,039,982 14.6%

These errors did not affect the outcome of the election of directors. No errors were reported with respect to the other proposals presented at the annual meeting

 

Original Broadridge statement (courtesy Kara Swisher, who broke the story):

On August 4, Broadridge was notified by an investor of a potential discrepancy in a reported vote at the Yahoo Annual Meeting on August 1.

Upon review, it was determined that there was a truncation error in the final printout sent to the tabulator. This resulted in the under-reporting of shares withheld for certain directors.

This error did not change the outcome of the election of directors, and was determined to be an isolated incident.

Broadridge has determined that the situation was unique – a truncation error occurred when shares withheld for a specific director in a specific nominee exceeded 8 digits and were reported to the tabulator in paper format. Broadridge has fixed the problem. Further, Broadridge has verified that over the past 18 months there were no other meetings with reports that included this unique combination of factors. The review is ongoing for meetings occurring before then.

On August 4th Broadridge notified Yahoo’s Inspector of Elections and Tabulator of the problem, and a revised report was issued on August 5th.

See Also: Yahoo Vote Scandal: Wait, We Meant To Say, "Fire Jerry!"



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

27 Comments

Filet O Fish said:
A+ to the schemer who cooked this one up.

Any stats on how often this sort of thing happens? When was the last proxy miscount of this magnitude?


Sammy Jammy said:
First this obviously doesn't happen often because you would hear about it. Secondly, read the first reason, you would have read about it. Maybe if you understand things better (ie. become literate) you won't ask stupid questions anymore.

I have to say I've never heard of it.

iPhoney said:
This is a total non-story. I know because I was there when the Burmese and Zimbabwean delegations arrived to count the proxies.

Filet O Fish w/Toasted Bun said:
@Sammy Jammy

Lemme guess....you're long YHOO ;)

frustrated said:
Ok, another example of why you cannot believe or trust anything or anyone that is part of the Yahoo bone head management team! Yeah right the offer from MSFT was not yada yada yada.
Yang the bone head takes his own number to MSFT, how many more examples does Wall Street need to start to scream “fire this board and especially Jerr.” As a stockholder I want those Asians assets sold!!

David E said:
Yet another example of a bunch of brilliant TECH guys trying to be CEOs.

As I'm writing this, the current stock price is at $19.83.

The Yahoo board has cost its shareholders $18,117,881,996 by not taking the Microsoft deal.

frustrated said:
As a shareholder I received many requests from Yahoo to call or send in how I was going to vote. For the record I withheld my vote for each and every current board member. So Gordy Crawford knew the vote was wrong but Yahoo after all the trouble it went through to get a count before the meeting did not. Come on!!!! The Yahoo board must go, I cannot believe what snakes these folks are. Ballmer please please come back to the table! Bostock in the future please save your breath no one can believe a word you say.

Hold on. What is the correct number who voted for the board? I still can't find it anywhere.

Just added numbers. 66% voted for Jerry. Only 61% for Bostock.

McRib said:
So Henry, what, if anything, do you see happening at Y in light of this vote? Looks some major dissent from shareholders.


stone said:
Earth to Henry! This is a vote of "No Confidence"! Yang and Bostock have to resign. This is a disaster!

Stone or anyone...question: Do votes that aren't actually placed count as "withheld"?

It's certainly a vote of frustration. I wouldn't go so far as to say disaster.

Bostock and Yang don't HAVE to do anything. And I suspect they'll just ignore. But it is certainly time for the board to come out and declare full confidence in management...or fire them.

Temporal said:
I don't think the votes that aren't actually placed count as 'withheld'. If it were, then the total votes cast would have been closer to 1.4b (total outstanding shares) as opposed to 1.05b.

Alex said:
Weird that they didn't make mistakes on the "For" votes. Those are 9-digit numbers as well, and thus you'd assume are too subjects to tabulation errors.

Trevor Plantagenet said:
Yes, Henry, for once, you're right. Bostock and Yang don't HAVE to DO anything. It's been amply proven again and again that they are very good at that.

ThaddeusVonBrunswick said:
So when's the SEC going to launch an investigation?

Sean said:
If I understand correctly, in the last 18 months, the amount of shares withheld for a director has *never* reached 8 digits (i.e. has never crossed 100 million).

In other words, Bostock and Yang received three-to-four *times* more withheld shares than has ever been seen in a shareholder meeting.

I don't know how many meetings Broadridge has tabulated but two things strike me about this:
(1) Dissent tends to be rare at shareholder meetings and
(2) The message being sent here is a huge and rare event. Bostock and Yang need to pay close attention to this one, and not just shrug it off.

michael s said:
Carl it seems underplayed his hand...he could have gotten Bostock fired, 4 board seats, and the commitment of a new Chairman to start searching for new management.


Well said:
I agree with michael S.

When it seems the majority of employees openly think the board, ceo & rest of exec. mgt. are idiots something is wrong.

Amazing how much steam a yahoo can let off over a couple beers.

stone said:
Henry,

The vote of no confidence coupled with this mistake is that makes this a disaster. Yahoo can ill afford missteps right now for they are very very wounded. This makes them look even worse and makes their senior leadership look ineffectual and damaged.

aytug akdogan said:
"aytug akdogan ödüllü 1. seo yarışması ve yurtta barış dünyada barış"
aytug akdogan ödüllü 1. seo yarışması ve yurtta barış dünyada barış aytug akdogan ödüllü 1. seo yarışması ve yurtta barış dünyada barış

annis (URL) said:
Latest Boneheaded Yahoo Move: Miscounted Proxy Votes**642-552Thinks one way but acts another. She's so hypocritical. She thinks one way but acts another. No need! I want to make sure that I get it straight.

caelie (URL) said:
640-802 Latest Boneheaded Yahoo Move: Miscounted Proxy Votes** Relax. You can count on me. What's the big deal!

prissy (URL) said:
Let's go. I'll buy you a drink. How did it come to this? 640-802 / 70-290 / 642-444 / 642-061 / 350-001

John Smith said:
The premier seller of air jordans and buy jordans and information on acne.

klingeltöne said:
Thanks, greate and useful article
good job!
Bei uns finden Sie über 50.000 Real Klingeltöne, Polyphone, Video Klingeltöne,Handy Logos, Handy Spiele, Handy Programme...Sie können die aktuellsten Klingeltöne auf Ihr Handy per sms herunterlden.
klingeltöne
handy spiele
handy videos
video klingeltöne
freizeichentöne
Handy Themen

Join the discussion