Yahoo Staffer Launches Management Buyout

|

yahoo-hq.jpgWhen Yahoo's stock hit $12, we said it was ridiculously cheap. Now it's below $9. Given that no one else seems to want to buy and fix this once-great and still amazingly valuable company, we're now offering to do it ourselves.

We have the privilege of being a co-host of Yahoo's "TechTicker" financial show. So that makes this an employee-led turnaround plan. To execute the plan, we're going to need the support of many other Yahoo employees, including Jerry Yang, David Filo, and the Board, so we're just going to call this a management buyout.  Cool?

We've structured our proposal to be as simple and easy as possible: No need for shareholder votes. No need to raise billions of dollars of capital (who has time for that?). No need for interminable, angst-ridden negotiations. We're also making the proposal completely transparent, so our fellow Yahoos and shareholders know what's coming.

Here's the plan:

  • Yahoo will acquire our parent company, Silicon Alley Media, for stock.  We already own some YHOO, and we're willing to put more money where our mouth is: Specifically, we're willing to bet our entire company on our YHOO turnaround plan.
  • Yahoo will appoint us as acting CEO.  No worries: We will not become yet another fat CEO pig at the trough. In fact, we're so excited about this opportunity that we'll do it for Jerry's salary: $1 a year (okay, maybe we could add some zeroes. But not six. Or, god forbid, eight). We also have no ambition to hold this post indefinitely. Several folks in the business world are more qualified to run a global Fortune 500 company than we are, and when the time is right, we will gladly hand the reins to one of them. Unlike many incoming Yahoo CEO candidates, however, we know what Yahoo needs right now, and there's no sense wasting time CEO-hunting when we can start the process today.
  • We will immediately resize the company, cutting approximately one-quarter to one-third of the cost base.  Even now, with its bloated cost structure, Yahoo is still making money. Our cuts will ensure that Yahoo is positioned to survive a major online ad downturn and still have plenty of cash flow to reinvest in the business. One big reduction instead of several small ones will also ensure that Yahoo doesn't go down the road it is heading down now, which is the demoralizing death by a thousand cuts.
  • We will do a search deal with Microsoft. Yahoo has lost the search game, and it is senseless for the company to throw more good money after bad.  Yahoo will continue to maintain a significant if declining share of search queries for the next few years, but these can be monetized better with economies of scale, and the company can avoid mindless and expensive duplication of effort. Microsoft is great at engineering and desperately wants to show Google who's boss. We'll sell Yahoo's search technology to Microsoft and do a multi-year revenue deal with them. And when it comes up for renewal, we will play Microsoft and Google off one another.
  • We'll step up Yahoo's focus on content aggregation. Algorithms cannot create the best user experience for every application. Yahoo highest and best opportunity is to do what Tim Koogle used to talk about in the 1990s and Jerry has been suggesting over the past year: Become the first stop for anyone looking for an intelligent, organized view of the world. The company has made great strides in this effort over the past 14 years, but it has gotten distracted of late.  We'll fix that.
  • We'll increase Yahoo's production of lightweight, high-velocity online content, through programs like TechTicker, blogs, fantasy sports leagues, etc. With a distribution platform that reaches 500 million global users a month, Yahoo can make a killing on low-cost content production. We will not turn Yahoo into the New York Times (which is a dying print business.) Instead, we will hire a few more folks from the New York Times and other excellent content-production companies (people who get the Internet). These folks will help edit, curate, and organize all the great content that's already out there and produce some good original stuff. (But not TV shows or magazine articles. TechTicker works because it takes advantage of what the Internet can do better than other media, not because it tries to clone CNBC or a newspaper).
  • We will buy or build small consumer subscription businesses that produce content that people will pay for...and then we will plug them into Yahoo's massive global distribution engine. In several years, we will build subscriptions into a major contributor to revenue, not the afterthought they are today.
  • We will fix Yahoo's communications platform, in part by buying and integrating AOL (and, if we can help Steve Ballmer see the light, MSN). As long-term Yahoo Mail users, we are appalled that Yahoo has fallen behind in this area. We don't want to switch to Gmail, but if nothing changes, we may have to.  Once we've integrated AIM and the AOL mail user base, we will once again have a dominant share of online communications. We'll probably buy Skype, too, just to round out the package.
  • Most importantly, we will finally revolutionize online display advertising, which hasn't innovated since 1995.  We can't tell you how tired we are of hearing advertisers complain that their display ads aren't "performing" because people aren't clicking on them. The same advertisers still line up around the block to buy unclickable ads in newspapers that get tossed on the back stoop without even being glanced at. It is time for the online ad industry to start developing better BRAND and STORYTELLING solutions. These ads can be big. They can be beautiful. They can be fun. They DO NOT need to be clicked on. If we do this intelligently, users should even come to value and/or enjoy them. No company is in a better position to lead this online ad revolution than Yahoo, and we can't wait to drive this initiative forward.

Sound good? We think so. We're not guaranteeing much of a turnaround in the stock price until the global economy recovers, but we're going to position the company to coin money when it does. We're going to stop Yahoo from trying to boil the ocean and compete in businesses it has already lost (search engineering). We're going to take advantage of what Yahoo does better than anyone: content organization and display advertising. We're going to inspire what used to be one of the industry's most passionate and competitive teams.

Despite its demolishied stock price and demoralized staff, Yahoo remains a one-of-a-kind global media platform. With the right turnaround plan, we think the company's best days (and possibly even best stock prices) are ahead of it. We would be honored and privileged to lead this revolution from within!



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

57 Comments

Mike said:
Henry! this is genius! I love everything you wrote here!
Goober said:
Henry,
Please help me understand why you keep saying they should sell the search business because "they lost that game". Should Pepsi sell their cola business to RC Cola since they've lost that game? Same thing. Who cares if Yahoo! is a strong second? Who cares if they are losing market share? The overall search pie is still growing as evidence by the fact that search revenues grew 17% for YHOO in Q3. It now represents mroe than half of the company's revenue.

The fact is that Yahoo!s future value proposition is fully squared on its ability to leverage the amazing amount of consumer insight/data across search & display. Nobody else has that kind of insight and what it leads to is unparalleled targeting. Selling search would kill the company. You are indeed a smart tech and financial analyst but you don't understand this business as well as you think you do. If you had spent some time at an ad/media buying agency and then at a publisher (like Yahoo!) you'd really hear what the marketplace is clamoring for: a TIGHTER integration of search & display, not a distancing (why do you think there is a Googleclick now?)
Ryan Kuder (URL) said:
I'm in. Yours may not be the exact right answer, but it's an answer. I just wish that sometime in the past year Yahoo had been able to step up and outline a plan like this. This is a 10 slide deck that outlines a path forward. It's time to do something...anything...it can't get much worse.
Goober... Yahoo will keep a hold on a significant percentage of search queries for years. In other words, yes, they'll remain a strong second. It's the way Yahoo monetizes this business that is flawed.

Search is very much a scale business: The more queries you have, the more advertisers you have bidding for them, the more you can spend on tech, and the higher keyword prices you can get. This is why Google is still clobbering everyone.

If Yahoo outsources search monetization to Microsoft, it will be able to stop investing in duplicative technology AND it will benefit from greater economies of scale.

Also, unlike the cola market, search is a natural monopoly. That's why Google has 75% share of spending. Yahoo and Microsoft's best chance to stem their loss of share is to combine forces and be a strong No. 2. Otherwise, their query share will just dwindle forever.
@Goober, Targeting is much less important to advertisers -- the people who pay the bills -- than what Henry described as "better BRAND and STORYTELLING solutions. These ads can be big. They can be beautiful. They can be fun." Targeting is an engineering obsession.
Garbanzo said:
Isn't Henry prohibited by court ruling associated with his sins from the '90s from being a "player" anymore?
Auguste Rodin said:

"seas would rise when I gave the word"
eh King Henry?!

great post...except for the part where you are CEO. arn't you barred from stuff like that? ;)

You outline a great plan. Love the cheap content, Skype and Aol bits.

Hopfully the board reads some of this stuff.
and actually, i thikn a GREAT swap swap would be MSFT swapping MSN for YHOO search, along with profit sharing on both sides.
that is a win win!
When you say "we" do you mean you? Because if you mean "we" as in Silicon Alley Media, does that mean me too? I'm just an intern, I know, but it'd be a great thing to put on a resume. Keep me abreast of how this turns out. Thanks!
No, actually allowed to be CEO. Just booted out of securities industry.
Yes, we can't all be CEO, but "we"--SAI--would definitely be part of Yahoo's newly invigorated content production teams.
I'll take it.
Michael Hickins (URL) said:
Henry, the content aggregation strategy you mention is potentially a huge winner. We tried this at www.thecuratorpage.com, but Lehman collapsed just as we were about to get financing, so we are no more.
But the one challenge we would have faced is getting a critical mass of readers, whereas of course Yahoo already has that.
Most established media companies recoil from linking to "the competition." Yahoo would have a green field for quite a while.
Exactly, Michael. The opportunity is massive. And Yahoo has been doing it in other ways for years.
Would I have to move to Sunnyvale?
Hell, no. New York still media capital of world. Yahoo needs a bigger presence in NY, not smaller.

(Alas, I would have to move to Sunnyvale. But there are certainly worse places to live than California paradise.)
Very nice. It's kinda like fantasy M&A. Can you do this and buy out the NYT?
happyhappy said:
ok henry - you'll get my support if you answer the following correctly:
axe sue, yes or no?
Neek said:
Would you be also thinking of doing a menage-a-trois with Y! and NYT?
Yes, similar offer to NYT. If Yahoo accepts, we could buy NYT Digital as well.
PeterW said:
Hire me, I'll work for free for the first year.
Michael Murdock (URL) said:
Not bad Henry. However, one reason people don't use Yahoo for search is because it's really not the focal point of the page. On Google when you land, SEARCH is right there. On Yahoo when you land, EVERYTHING is right there. So search becomes the last thing on your mind.

Any user interface guru will tell you that when you want a user to do something,(Steve Krug wrote the book) Don't Make Them Think (his was Don't Make ME Think).

So...change the front page, make everything else accessible sort of like google does with igoogle, track what's getting used, and what's not, do away with what is not being used, or relegate it to another lower placed option within a preferences area.

Result...Increased search market share.

Michael Murdock - The NEXT Yahoo CEO
It must be friday
Scott Moore said:
Love your plan, Henry. Good luck!
achates said:
I think it should work the other way around - Microsoft should buy into Yahoo, with its own online operations as part of the stake. Makes sense that merging number 3 into number 2 would create something stronger than the reverse.

Agree on the content focus and have also suggested buying the NYT (market cap <$1B - the brand ought to be worth that by itself).
KiasuChick said:
Great plan!

Get rid of the dead wood please!

SAI_dont_get_advertising said:
@Nicholas Carlson You guys really don't get advertising. Consumers don't respond to "big" "beautiful" advertising. It's not about wildly rich media and storytelling and bigger ad units. Advertisers don't throw down the big bucks for that anymore and the consumer response and latent brand attitudinal change just doesn't happen anymore. Much like the web has been fragmented consumers minds and appetite for "advertising" isn't there anymore. Your thirst for getting the equivalent to a TV commercial online is a waste of time and effort. Online marketing, integrated content, and usable tools that generate access to purchasing consumer products is where it is and you will see this change soon.

So until you decide to take over an entirely ad supported online company, maybe you should think about what you're about to do because just reshuffling the cards and cutting some costs will only get you so far, at some point you will actually need to know what you're doing...and based on this blog post you might as well be Jerry Yang.
anon said:
Evolving display advertising is a very good idea.
Rationality said:
Re: ads, unfortunately website owners have been selling clickthroughs and "measurability" since day 1, even though that's somewhat BS, like with print and TV. Re: NY Times, don't hire people from bloated bureaucracies unless that's what you want. Plenty of good people elsewhere. Otherwise, very good. A leader with nuts and charisma would be a good thing at Yahoo.
CPM Jedi said:
Sign me up. Love it.
Derrick (URL) said:
Content aggregation especially around video is still a big opportunity. Who will become the global next-generation Comcast of Internet video? Instead of trying to compete with YouTube on the UGC side of the house how about developing the ultimate start page/interactive program guide (IPG) for Internet video. Take a look at Invision.TV - http://www.invision.tv for an idea.
pav Ookles said:

$100mn for SAI!?!?!?!?
wow, that's almost as much as you were paid while at ML no? seems a bit steep. tha'ts probably like $10,000 per post!
how about you your ownership of SAI into a blind trust and then get to work. wouldnt want the CEO distracted.
This isn't like Apple getting Steve back and having to buy NexT to make it happen.
Advertisers have to tell stories somewhere. And if point is to trigger a sale, a banner ad is just a terrible way to do it. Dozens other other possibilities that don't necessarily involve a click.

"Beautiful" is the wrong word. They can be ugly. I'm just saying that the whole premise of "display" has to be rethought. There is enormous value there that is not being taken advantage of.

And they can still be "measurable." The key metrics can just be impressions instead of clicks (combined with sampling branding impact on that particular user, etc.)
bicimucho said:
Very entertaining post Henry. Yes, some of what you suggested makes sense and I'm sure any restructuring consultant called in post buy-out would make a lot of the same choices. I do, however, agree with *Goober* and *SAI_dont_get_advertising*. You need to really look at your ad play. It's flawed and a bit off the mark. It's the total integration of all of the various platforms that's key, and not just "better BRAND and STORYTELLING solutions".
Masteroftheuniverse said:
Finally! And keep Sue Decker around please!
Agree with "total integration." Definitely not just about branding. Just think that searching for product with intent to buy (Google) is a different opportunity, one that will always be a separate opportunity from overall informing, brand positioning, etc. And I don't think the same company needs to run the technology that supports both.
I've Got Cashews said:
Whatever Blodget is smoking, may it be organic and may he be kind of heart and share it with his fellow man.
JDH4 (URL) said:
OK, Henry, I like the idea. Won't work for free, but will defer compensation for 8 quarters. Lunch at 21 Club?

No matter who ends up running Yahoo!, changes are needed there beginning with the Board. It's disfunctional. Half has wanted to sell the company to see their pockets fattened while the other half has wanted to keep Yahoo! independent. That bi-polar debate needs to cease. The Jobsian solution is that the Board goes and build a new, more competant Board from scratch.

And remaining Yahoos need a rally point, they need to know that their work will go to making a stronger independent Yahoo!, not an acquisition target so that management can parachute out.
Joe Commentor said:
@Michael Murdock

You mean a page like search.yahoo.com
sidney said:
So Henry, what you going to do about Yahoo's asia holdings?
happyhappy said:
@henry -
if that was the real scott moore posting above you should quickly see if he will come back once you've taken over...put him in charge of as much as you can.

oh, and don't forget to show ash the door at the same time you're axing sue...
will work for food said:
hey,
do you need a banker?
Asia holdings probably get jettisoned. Have to evaluate what if any synergy, tax impact, etc.
hey Henry said:
agree that nothing's been done with online advertising since 1995.

let us know if your plan doesn't work out, because there's another way. remember quokka and the advertiser storytelling and integration there? some of us are still around.
Hey...Quokka did some really good stuff. Before its time, obviously.
Michael Murdock (URL) said:
Yes, Joe Commentator, but with some spice. Not the whole bucket all at once.
hey Henry said:
maybe now's the time.
oh, and one more thing... said:
Nice plan - but don't forget about the internal/organizational stuff as well, which is at least half the problem at Yahoo.

You have to be an employee to appreciate how deeply f'd up the org structure is at Yahoo. It's a shame really, they've taken a lot of hard-working, smart employees and arranged them in a haphazard manner that is guaranteed to frustrate if not fail outright.

The ideas you mention aren't exactly new within the walls of the 'hoo. The challenge is getting someone on top to actually decide, and then reshaping the organization into something that will actually achieve it. (And being able to live with the fact that you're going to fire a lot of perfectly nice and capable people in doing so.)

(Oh, and btw, I don't mean to imply that Yahoo is the only company that is horrendously disorganized. There are plenty of other organizations that are just as bad, if not worse, *cough* Google *cough*. It's just that Yahoo! doesn't have a single galactically profitable revenue stream that allows the 95% of the org who don't generate a dime to politely ignore how screwed up things are.)
Ken G. said:
Hey, Henry, I worked in Sunnyvale about 25 years ago. It's a nice place. Though I prefer Denver (my residence for most of the last 25 years), you could do worse than live there.

Actually, Cupertino, Mountain View, and Los Gatos are nicer than Sunnyvale, from what I recall. Easy commutes from those towns. Good luck!
Mike @ WannaDevelop.com (URL) said:
Cool. I'm in :)

Mike
http://www.wannadevelop.com/
pics (URL) said:
Isn't Henry prohibited by court ruling associated with his sins from the '90s from being a "player" anymore?
Thanks; My Web Page is : http://www.sinsinema.com/
Mac DVD Ripper is an all-in-one DVD ripper for Mac OS X software. This Mac DVD Ripper is an excellent DVD Decryption tool for Mac users to rip DVD to various video formats (including MP4, AVI, M4V, MOV, 3GP, MPG, FLV) and audio formats (MP3, M4A, AAC, WAV, OGG, APE, etc.) for playback on iPod touch, iPod classic, iPod nano, iPhone, Apple TV, PSP, PS3, Youtube (web), Creative Zen, iRiver PMP, Archos, all kinds of video cell phones and digital video and audio players. The Mac DVD Ripper is what godgious you need to put your DVD movies on your mobile devices.This Mac DVD Ripper software lets you select DVD subtitle and audio track, choose any DVD chapters/titles you want to convert, trim any DVD chapters/titles, and even merge more than one DVD chapter/title into a single file. Put your DVD movies on almost any mobile devices with this professional Mac DVD Ripper Software! please take a carefully look at the following link:Mac DVD Ripper.and another a greate converter software is vob converter for mac.VOB Converter for Mac is an excellent VOB to Video conversion software for Mac OS users to convert VOB files on Mac to various video formats perfectly and quickly. The Mac VOB converter supports converting VOB to mp4, avi, mov, mpeg-4 etc and also converting to PSP, Apple TV , iPod, iPhone, Archos, video mobile phone, Zune, etc. Aha,please come in the following link:VOB Converter for Mac
NYCstartupfiend said:
whether or not this is a good idea, you'd think you would show a little humility considering that none of you has ever run anything bigger than a blog. Maybe, just maybe the whole management thing is harder than you think it is?
Michael Murdock (URL) said:
Nobody said it was easy. It's just that companies get glossy-eyed when it comes to someone supposedly lower in the ranks than a "ceo who has run blah, blah, blah company" coming in to save the day.

Some think that by magically hiring someone who has been at AOL or some other company doing similar things that the problems are automatically solved. That rarely if ever happens. In fact most of the time they bail out with millions of dollars in their pocket leaving the company high and dry. That's the sad part about it.

It's funny, in an email a while ago I asked Dvorak about this and he told me I was 'too sensitive' to do the job. Screw that. I am sensitive to the people, but also to the mission of the company and getting the job done. This would not be easy, but it can be accomplished.

It's going to take some house cleaning and it cannot be done by someone internal. They are too attached to the people, the feelings of the company and too many friends etc. I can come at this in a no judgement, no blame way and make things happen quickly. Yes there will be a cut. 1, not many. After the 1 cut there has to be a meeting of the minds and a cohesive plan of action to turn the company into an unstoppable machine of revenue and excitement for investors.

Too bad nobody at YahooHQ is reading this and taking notes. They can have me come up, present in person to them, field questions and then make me an offer. Nobody else out there is ready to come to work now. I am ready as soon as they are to get moving on things. I don't take holidays, I don't like days off (although I do take them) and I don't mind working an 18-20 hour day to help a company get back on its feet.

Show me 1 other person in the list of "considered" that will do that. You won't find 1.

Michael
DVD Converter Mac is a powerful DVD converter for Mac OS users to rip DVD to all popular video and audio formats with various customized settings and convert video among all popular video and audio formats with perfect 1:1 ratio on Mac. In fact, the DVD Converter Mac is a DVD Converter for Mac Ultimate which includes 4 outstanding multimedia applications: DVD Ripping Mac, DVD Creater for Mac, Copy DVD on Mac and Mac Video Converter.With the DVD Converter Mac, you can convert MP4, M4V, MPA, MPG, MPEG, MOV, 3GP, 3GP2, FLV, VOB, DAT, TS, TP, TRP, M2TS, AVI to DVD and even burn DVD movie on Mac.That's sure powerfully, hurry to see it!DVD Converter for Mac.Now let's see another converter software is Mac AVI Converters.Mac AVI Converters is a powerful and versatile Video/Audio Conversion utility for Mac OS X users to convert video files from one format to another and extract or save the audio tracks on Mac OS X (including OS X 10.5 Leopard). The Mac AVI Converters helps you convert AVI to video formats like, DivX, MPEG, MPG, FLV, DAT, MOV, ASF, FLV, etc. It can also extract audio from video to MP3, WMA, AC3, AAC, M4A, WAV, OGG, 3GP, etc.The Mac AVI Converters can also convert MPEG1, MPEG2, MP4, 3GP, 3G2, MOV, Mpeg TS/TP (for HD Video) formats, too.With such powerful and versatile AVI converter for Mac, you can easily playback AVI video files on any popular video players, like iPod, PSP, Apple TV, Archos, iRiver, Creative Zen, PS3 or other portable MP4 players. Try Mac AVI Converter for free.That's a turely chance,hurry to see it!AVI Converter for Mac.
Thanx You Very Much alley

lig tv izle

forum
Rudbeckia said:
Henry,
just wondering what the status of this above mentioned Employee MBO is? All I see in the news and on the blogs now is the naming of the new CEO and the Microsoft/Yahoo deal...

Join the discussion