World's Second-Largest Search Engine Starts Selling Ads

|

Google makes its billions selling ads against its text search results, charging marketers per click. Now its trying the same thing with YouTube, reports the Times:

An advertiser — or a video maker who wants to promote a work — can bid on keywords like “silly cats,” “financial crisis,” “James Bond,” or anything that strikes one’s fancy. The promoted videos are featured on the right-hand side of the YouTube search-results page with a small image and some text. Advertisers are charged when a viewer clicks on the ad, and can set a maximum price per click that they want to pay.

Smart move. Did you know YouTube alone sees more search queries than all of Yahoo's properties and more than twice as many as Microsoft's? See ComScore's expanded search query report for August, below.

But don't go expecting Google search revenues to go up 30% or anywhere close to it; no one searches YouTube looking to buy stuff they way they do with regular search.

So far, against searches like "tech news," "American Idol," and "Razorbacks football," we found movie trailer ads for the new Punisher and James Bond flicks as well as typical TV commercial from Lego -- pretty poor targeting, we think. One better sign: An ad for a Sony and Intel branded YouTube channel showed up next to search results on the terms "tech news."

We also expect some of those semi-professional video producers that Gartner says will earn $75 million this year and $1.5 billion by 2012 will spend a small portion of that promoting their shows on YouTube search.

ComScoreExpanded.gif



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

5 Comments

mjw149 said:
Well, that seems to debunk the idea that Youtube was a mistake for Google. It has THREE TIMES the search volume of AOL. Though, to be fair, if you're searching for something on Youtube, you're probably not looking to buy anything.
David Gonzales (URL) said:
Well, a click is a click, and that's where the money is made. Anyway, this is a significant step in the right direction for Google and it's baby. It's interesting to watch how this develops.
h8ter said:
Its a great purchase only if you have limitless cash like Google or MS. It is one of the most popular sites and by far dominates the video space. However, it also burns a ton of cash. I don't see it being profitable anytime soon.
Mike (URL) said:
It will be profitable... This things take time. Google is smart with their operations and I am sure they have been developing a customized ad system specifically for YouTube to make the most of what they got.

Just have to sit and wait now... we'll see how this plays out :)

Mike
http://www.wannadevelop.com/
Marah Marie (URL) said:
@mjw149: Just a quick reminder: AOL has it's own search traffic because it host the results, not because it runs the search engine that brings'm to ya...

AOL has begun seriously trying to make more money off of Google-powered search only in the last year or two.

When AOL has it's own search engine and it's own original, proven ideas on how to profit from it I'll stop believing it's search traffic should actually be added to Google's balance sheets, not AOL's.

Join the discussion