Obama CTO Search Gets Help

|

juliusgenachowski.jpgPresident-elect Obama asked his adviser on tech and innovation, Julius Genachowski, to join his transition team and help him select staff for the new administration. That means he could help pick Obama’s chief technology officer.

Genachowski has solid tech credentials – he was an exec at IAC (IACI), was chief counsel to former FCC. chairman Reed Hundt, is co-founder of Rock Creek Ventures, and helped found LaunchBox, a startup incubator.

So, in theory, Genachowski could even qualify to be Obama's CTO himself. (Update: Readers point out that he's a laywer, not a tech guy. So let's rule that out.) Other, higher-profile names that have been mentioned: Google’s (GOOG) Eric Schmidt and Vint Cerf, Microsoft’s (MSFT) Steve Ballmer, and Amazon’s (AMZN) Jeff Bezos.

Or Genachowski could have another gig in store: Last month, BusinessWeek suggested he could run the FCC if current chair Kevin Martin quits.

See Also:
Ari Gold's Brother To Be Obama's Chief Of Staff
President Obama's First Step: Reset Expectations



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

5 Comments

Andrew Finkle (URL) said:
This is THE single most important hire (CTO) for Obama. Government 1.0 is so stuffed with bureaucracy and waste. Technology can cut out HUGE amounts of waste and cost in the system. TRILLIONS

Go GOVERNMENT 2.0!!!

www.twitter.com/A_F
geewhiz said:
This is a bonehead post if I've ever seen one. I know Julius and he is FAR from qualified to be the CTO of ANYTHING! He's a vc, lawyer and Internet watcher --- not a tech guy. Sorry, good try.
Garbanzo said:
Getting someone from the Internet world is SO wrong for the CTO post. What do VCs, start-up kids, etc. know about large organizations spending tens of billions on technology (one could make the same argument about freshly minted MBAs becoming analysts on Wall Street, but that's a discussion for another day).

It's less about technology and more about large organizational dynamics and plenty of non-sexy back office processes and systems, coupled with the severe constraints of dealing with the civil service (again, no analogue in the start-up world). You need a successful large company CIO or a Global 2000 CEO/CFO who has technology roots. The big question here is what type of governance structure will arise -- a GAO aggregation of power type model or something akin to the OMB where they make the rules and everyone else has to follow them.
bobthegreat said:
henry:

This will be a policy job. Not a tech-visionary job. And it has very little to do with the current spend of the federal government on tech infrastructure.

Julius is qualified as former counsel of the FCC. So is his former boss, Reed Hundt (whom I believe does not want the job). So is Don Gips (who probably will not want to leave Boulder).

The views that a techie is the right guy for this job is just absolutely wrong. You need someone who understands economics, policy, politics and their intersection with technology. In general, techies are really bad choices for this job.

B
Daniel said:
The "Who" will probably largely define the "What."

Join the discussion