Mossberg Pees On BlackBerry Bold: Bulky, Heavy, Expensive

|

blackberry-bold.jpgTeam Mossberg at the WSJ (Katherine Boehret) pees on RIM's BlackBerry Bold, which quietly went on sale yesterday. The bottom line: big, heavy, and expensive:

I've been using the Bold for the past couple of weeks, both in New York City and in Washington, D.C., and had almost no trouble doing email and Web browsing with its 3G network connection and Wi-Fi capability. I admit that I didn't use it much as a phone, mostly because its bulky size made it awkward to hold to my ear while chatting...

But the Bold reminded me of my grandparents' new Buick: handsomely polished and luxuriously comfortable, with plenty of extra bells and whistles. As much as I like the plush feel of this ride, it can feel as big as a boat when I need to park or navigate narrow city streets. Likewise, the Bold's large size affords mobile extravagances like a keyboard I could use without looking down and a leatherette-covered back panel. But when tossed in a bag or even held in my hand, the BlackBerry Bold simply feels too heavy and too big.

Furthermore, this device's $300 price is steep considering it comes with only one gigabyte of memory, and a memory-card slot for expanding that should you choose to do so. By comparison, Apple's smallest $199 iPhone comes with eight gigabytes of memory.

Etc.  Perhaps the biggest diss is that Katherine reviewed it instead of Walt. Can you imagine Walt not reviewing a shiny new Mac or iPhone?

See Also: BlackBerry Bold Goes On Sale, Everyone Yawns



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

5 Comments

rolf said:
how about "disses" or "snubs"? your insisted use of the term "pees on" is either obstinacy or some weird obsession with bodily functions. either way, it doesn't reflect well upon you. i'm the farthest thing from being a prude, but you really need to expand your vocabulary a bit and act your age.
bolweevil said:
on that note:
Kathy peeing is a better visual than Walt peeing?
Joseph Kingsbury (URL) said:
The iPhone and Blackberry Bold comparisons are overdone. Their target demographics may overlap some but they are generally different devices aimed at different audiences. iPhone and BB Storm will be the truer matchup.
Craig (URL) said:
Henry, you must be short RIMM. What other explanation can there be for your grossly distorted take on WSJ’s glowing review of the Bold? Come on...you're much better than this.

http://www.candidcritic.com/blodget-must-be-short-research-in-motion-rimm/2008/11/05/
Bill said:
Wow, nice catch Craig. C'mon Henry, Katherine herself proclaims to the world that her column reflects her personal opinion only. So she prefers a smaller device - so what? RIMM makes smaller devices too. But millions of people like me will prefer a better keyboard and bigger screen and bigger battery and will happily carry a larger phone in exchange. Do you really think that "small" is the only criteria for all customers? Is so, RIMM wins anyway because Pearl is way, WAY smaller than iphone or other competitors.

And you even distorted her core message - she said, right in the headline, that it is "beautiful"! And Craig's link covers much more glowing praise from Katherine that you want to distort for some reason. The market is turbulent enough, we don't need misleading stories (although I notice that RIMM is up today while the market is down, so I maybe most investors actually read Katherine's review).

http://www.candidcritic.com/blodget-must-be-short-research-in-motion-rimm/2008/11/05/

Join the discussion