The US Government Catches The Twitter Bug, And Amazingly, Does It Well

|

capitol.jpgWe never thought we'd say this either. But some of the best and most innovative new media experiments going on right now on the Internet are coming from the U.S. federal government.

For, example: Twitter. Turns out the messaging service's 140 character limit and easy following/unfollowing is a really effective way to check up on our public servants. And it's certainly easier to read than most .gov websites.

Compare some of the below government twitter feeds with the the mixed bag that have been corporate Twitter experiements, or the disaster when some journalistic enterprises (other than @alleyinsider) have tried to get in on the microblogging game. Here are a few of our favorites:

@CSIState - Country specific information and travel alerts from the US Department of State

@foodrecalls - The Food and Drug Adminsitration tweets when food products have been deemed unsafe, about once a day.

@jetlab - Rocket science from NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory

@NIHforHealth - Research reports of the National Institutes of Health

@PeaceCorps - Press releases from the Peace Corps

@TSABlogTeam - The Transportation Security Administration, which operates the widely-hated system of airport security checkpoints, links to a series of surprisingly thoughtful articles about its mission.

@USGS - The US Geological Survey.  Not just rocks, also tweets about climate change, natural disasters, and alternative energy.

Of course, not every government twitter feed works well. A few that need to be rethought or dropped:

@HomelandSecurit - Department of Homeland Security. Tweets the national threat level ("yellow.") Both the color codes and this twitter should be abandoned.

@SenateFloor (and @HouseFloor) - US Senate/House actions. Actual tweet: "Vote: Motion to Invoke Cloture on the Motion to Concur in the House Amdt. to the Senate Amdt. to." Well-intentioned but not useful.

@USAgov - "Official web portal of the U.S. federal government." Infrequently updated, tinyurl links go to the wrong pages.

@USCIS - U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Tweets which CIS offices are closed -- of value solely to CIS employees, not to its customers.

Got other favorites and turkeys? Let your fellow SAI readers know in the comments!

See also:
The Cops Are On Twitter. But That's A Good Thing
Things Better Left Off Twitter: The Funeral Of A 3-Year-Old Boy
Twitter's Corporate Users Get A New Marketing Tool
Corporate Twitters Worth Following - And Some You Should Avoid



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

13 Comments

Mr. Make It Happen (URL) said:
The Twitter Commandments; http://tinyurl.com/3rhtwp

Cindy Stanford (URL) said:
Good post! You missed @SEC_Investor_Ed at http://twitter.com/SEC_Investor_Ed with tweets from the Securities and Exchange Commission. My guess (based on the Twitter handle) is the intent is to educate investors.

Mark Drapeau (URL) said:
The biggest problem with many government efforts on Twitter is that in a very conversational medium, they have very little interaction with other users. These entities rarely follow people or @reply; rather, they push messages out. Some of those messages are "good" but that's not the point. The point is, a lot of the effort is Web 1.0 masquarading as 2.0 and while the effort is wonderful there is a lot of room for improvement. See more in depth analysis at Mashable.com here, "Being Individually Empowerful." -- http://mashable.com/2008/08/26/government-20-being-individually-empowerful/

Emma (URL) said:
@Greenversations is a good government (Environmental Protection Agency) blog, but anything solely run by twitterfeed makes me nervous.

One huge dilemma gov't tweeting dilemma is whether whoever is running it is authorized to say so many things. Another is being seen as "approving" someone's content if they are @replied.

How would we rather see the government tweeting?

Maxine Teller (URL) said:
Yep, I 100% agree with Mark's assessment in the previous comment. While some of the examples mentioned in this blog post are, indeed, good data being pushed, most are very 1-way, or 1.0.

There are two other related challenges for government agencies--as well as for corporations and other organizations.

The first challenge for government agencies, corporations and other organizations is that they are NOT a single person. Even if the agency/corporation assigns an individual to be its "face" in the 2.0 world, how can a single person represent an enormous organization?

The second challenge is a Catch-22 of 2.0. Web 2.0 is about authenticity, transparency and participation. These attributes add up to having a single persona, blurring the line between personal self and professional self. How can that individual whose job it is to be the "face" of a given agency/corporation/organization truly be authentic and transparent if he/she is supposed to be representing that agency/corporation/organization... and yet.... how can he/she NOT be fully authentic and transparent in the 2.0 world where anything less yields skepticism and distrust?

Andrea Baker (URL) said:
Mark's previous blog on individually empowered is right on. I will admit, I do run a government twitterfeed (@OPM) that I created as a necessity for me. Especially in the winter months. I want to know as soon as its released if the government is open or closed due to snow or other dangerous conditions. From that I added in other releases, from the official announcements. Now, I would really like to find the right person at OPA to help manage this account because if someone asks questions to @OPM, most likely its something I could probably answer, however I would like to direct it to something more official.

I do know that because of the technical crowd that I interact with on twitter, I am able to see new ideas and technology and ask the question, how can this apply to us in Government. If it does apply, I will look into it more, if it doesn't I can file it away as something we looked into, but did not pursue for whatever reason. I can say technology influence definitely helped me make my informed decision when it came to throwing my support behind WordPress as a blogging platform. We did eventually choose WordPress as our Enterprise blogging solution and it has definitely moved us ahead in opening the lines of communication and collaboration within our community.

Kelcy Allwein said:
One problem is that many government IT organizations treat social software as viruses and do not permit connection to websites or applications. Risk aversion as a security measure needs to be dropped for more effective education on how to operate in a socially networked but sometimes hostile world coupled with smartly managed IT security measures to ferret out those intent on harming government networks.

Steve Lunceford (URL) said:
The last few comments are spot on. Rather than Big Brother simply sending out soundbites, at the end of the day, government needs to encourage more people like Mark Drapeau and Steve Ressler (founder of http://www.govloop.com/). We need individuals who are enthusiastic about the social medium and can help guide their agencies through the benefits and potential pitfalls of more two-way interaction with citizens, the contracting community, fellow gov workers, etc.

Mark Drapeau (URL) said:
Kelcy, who has the anti-virus? Ha ha.

Steve - thanks.

Ari Herzog (URL) said:
Hi folks--

Great comments so far from people who I both know from Twitter and others who I'd enjoy conversing with.

Along with the above Twitter handles, I maintain a list (one of many) at http://twitter.pbwiki.com/USGovernment which you may want to bookmark for reference; I will be updating it in the next few days with some more tweeps.

Carolyn Leber (URL) said:
I got a twitter follow from business.gov today and I must say was a little intimidated by it - ie: "big brother is watching you" spookiness, but got over it after a minute or so. Great article (which I found on their feed).

Jennie Anderson, AIDS.gov (URL) said:
Thank you for the interesting post. AIDS.gov, located in the Office of HIV/AIDS Policy at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, has recently started using Twitter @AIDSgov. We are still exploring the possibilities, but so far have found Twitter to be a useful tool. We've also enjoyed learning from our colleagues'experiences using Twitter.

Steve Lunceford (URL) said:
Eric, if you get a chance, you may want to clear out some of the spam comments that seemed to have crept in over the weeks since your first post.

To your point about other favorites/resources: Over at BearingPoint we've launched a new directory of Federal agencies and individuals using Twitter (along with industry, state and local, the Hill and International government as well). You can visit http://www.GovTwit.com for the directory, and follow http://twitter.com/GovTwit to be notified whenever there are updates.

Join the discussion