AOL - Yahoo Merger NOT A Done Deal, Says Time Warner Source*
A source close to AOL told us earlier that Yahoo's acquisition of AOL was a done deal. However, another senior source at Time Warner emphatically denied this. We apologize for the head-fake.
The two companies are still talking, the Time Warner source says, but a deal is "not imminent."
(Our original source expected a formal announcement tomorrow and reported the amusing sighting of a full-length Yahoo 18-wheeler semi-truck near AOL's Dulles campus.)
Some possible new variants on the already reported terms, none confirmed.
- Yahoo may acquire all of AOL, including the access business. This is smart, actually. The access business has real value and is tightly integrated into the content and advertising businesses. It will also allow Time Warner to sell AOL for a less embarrassing price. Then Yahoo can figure out what to keep and what to kill, rather than AOL doing it artificially for them.
- Purchase price might be $8-$10 billion. For the content and ad business alone, this would be way too high. If the deal includes the access business, however, it's in the ballpark of reasonable.
- No information yet on additional terms: Time Warner contributing cash, taking huge percentage of combined company, etc.
As we've discussed frequently over the past year, an AOL-Yahoo combination makes sense. By merging communications (email/IM), content (weblogs), ad networks, search, etc., the company will become an even more powerful global platform and a more effective competitor to Google.
Execution is crucial, however. Yahoo needs to ruthlessly eliminate redundancy and completely integrate what remains, or the merger will be a distraction and flop. Unfortunately, Yahoo has not yet demonstrated that it has this competency.
See Also:
Jerry, Please Don't Buy AOL For $8 Billion
Yahoo About To Overpay for AOL?




Looks like Bebo will go down as the Broadcast.com of Web 2.0...
I actually had a former co-worker say a few weeks ago that he had seen the 10-wheeler - not sure if it's back this week or not...
:(
So sad. AOL will only make Yahoo fail, although I suppose if you're of the ripitoff school of bandaid management, Yahoo failing faster is a good thing. At least it ends the suffering with less pain.
I can't help but wonder where the Board is while all this is going on. Icahn? Bueller? Anyone? Oh, right, this board is the same one that kept Semel in too long, then gave the CEO slot to Jerry, blew up the Microsoft offer, and has left itself wide open for random lawsuits for failure in fundamental duties of care, fiduciary responsibility, etc.
Time to sit back and enjoy the show. Where's my popcorn?
Truck delivering servers in the October timeframe listed in the article.
Nobody asked you to read this website. Stop bitching. Looks like your wives gave you a hard time last night. I know where you can get a 100% confirmed story: its called "The Washington Post". The paper version will cost you 50c so make sure you visit the ATM.
Henry is trying his best to break a BIG story. In this industry, there is no smoke without a fire.
Henry keep up the good work - we want to hear all the rumours and blow by blow account.
Things are business as usual down here in Dulles this afternoon.
Of course, it will make for a great visual, when/if the deal is done.
I dont think its possible to cause further damage is it?
This article is an embarassment.
Re: The Yahoo 18-wheeler. That is a regular occurrence of the morning heading South on Route 28. I saw that thing on an almost weekly during my time at Dulles. It would usually run a little after 9am. Check your source...and email me when the boxes arrive.
The good news MIGHT be that you may still get your bonus. Last October's layoffs WERE bonus eligible. However, the small group let go in September of this year are not.
That's what I would do.
All SVPs and EVPs at AOL have been given RETENTION packages. In case, you are not familiar - a Retention package offers additional bonus and incentives to stay with the company upto a certain date. For example, the AOL retention package may offer $30K cash bonus if the VP sticks with AOL until March 01, 2009.
Moral of the story:
The Execs have been given "bail out" packages. The worker-bees are being to told to "stay focussed" and keep working hard. AOL Management has been asked to keep the Retention package info "confidential".
I think I agree more w/ Big Papi. The cost cutting in Dulles has been extreme in the last 4 months or so. Unless Yahoo grossly overpays, I would expect that trend to continue.
Big Papi, glad to see you're still well informed! How's the weather treating you down there? :)
Skip
Interesting example -- AOL's "other" video game site gamedaily.com, actually gets more traffic than the overrated (and more expensive to run) joystiq.com.
And people, step off HB's butt. He claims he had a bad source - not a big deal! If he takes the post down now it looks like he's hiding something and how does he have something to hide when his source was bad, not his own judgment? At least he was honest enough to admit it right there in the post, and to update with more facts as he got them - and yeah, the truck, right, so what, whatever.
I would think it's bad enough to *have* a bad source and to have to admit it without all of you piling on in the comment section about it, too - adding insult to injury.
This is likely the point isn't it? Bewkes promised a while back he'd publish the breakout of the impact of dialup subscriber traffic on AOL's content business. Then he didn't. Miller, who'd know, was blocked from the Y board for some reason. This has always been the area where the microscope needs to be focused by a prospective AOL purchaser.
Rather than urging Yang not to pay more than $6B (ex access) you should be urging him to not pay more than a multiple of earnings for the ad bus after excluding dialup subscriber clicks from those earnings. The Y board need to first arrive in a position where they have thoroughly and diligently exposed and comprehended the value of AOL’s ad business, excluding the impact of dialup subscriber traffic on that ad business, & then pay a reasonable multiple for that in a transaction excluding access, and they need to separately expose that value first even in a transaction including access subscribers. If they don’t, and they overpay as a result, then they should be held accountable to Y shareholders.
You fueled speculation and created volatility while touting internet stocks back in the day and now you're doing it through this website. Same deplorable behavior, different venue.
Real journalists do not speculate and post innuendo in order to increase their web traffic and unique visitor count on their site. They report the real story while sticking to facts and the facts alone.
Something you clearly paid little to no attention on when authoring your alleged breaking story on a deal being done.
Yahoo
Seriously, I can speak first hand - 2 months notice. Sorry gang.
As to AOL, I'm surprised they still exist. Well, at least I assume they do...
(These two companies have been extremely useful).
Jerry Gropp Architect AIA PS