Washington Post Reeling: Print Ads Down 22%, Online Growth Slowing To A Crawl

|

newsies.jpgNo point in comparing the Washington Post's Q2 numbers to Wall Street's expectations -- the newspaper business has gotten hammered so badly that only one analyst -- Lehman's Craig Huber -- is offering up estimates anymore. But for the record, the Post's (WPO) performance was worse than Craig predicted.

The details: The company lost 31 cents a share on revenue of $1.1 billion, which is up 6%. Back out one-time charges and EPS climbs back to $5.70 -- below Craig's $6.90, if you're scoring at home. But those numbers include Wapo's Kaplan group, which continues to do quite well.

The newspaper unit, of course is a different story:

Revenue $197 million, down 13% y/y

Operating income, net of a $79.8 million charge for buyouts/layoffs, is a $16.9 million loss, versus a $17.7 million gain last year. That's because both advertisers and subscribers are fleeing the paper: Print advertising was down 22% in the quarter, with subs for the daily edition down 2.6% and the Sunday edition down 3.7% for the first half of 2008.

What about online? No help there: online revenue growth is slowing. Digital was up a mere 4%, to $29.3 million, decelerating from modest 8% growth in Q1. Display ads were up 11%, down from 17% in Q1, and classified ads on washingtonpost.com shrank by 1%; in Q1 they'd at least grown 2%. Thanks for nothing, Craigslist!

Glutton for more grim news on a Friday morning? Keep reading:

TV revenue: Down 6%

Magazine revenue: Down 15%, due to a 21% decline in ads at Newsweek. Maybe Real Dan Lyons/Fake Steve Jobs can turn things around.

And the obligatory bit of good news: Cable TV is in good shape, with revenues up 16%.

See Also: Craigslist Killing Wapo Online, Offline
Craigslist CEO: Our Online Ads Are Booming



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

11 Comments

the Wayward O (URL) said:
once they wise up and start covering the Os again the loot will flow.

Newspaper business got only so much time to live. Just like film based cameras. So no wonder that print advertising was down 22% in the quarter

slimball said:
Sure, hire a bunch of folks from Brassring for Online Technology and see what happens.
I know, its only tech and they don't do the ad thing but please

Yes said:
Maybe

The Washington Post must be doing something right. I just subscribed to the print edition today. How did they do it? Gave me a huge discount off the newsstand price.


wow gold (URL) said:
Buy WOw gold, cheap world of warcraft woW gOld, buy gold warcraft WOw gold? We sell World of Warcraft wow gold,
Cheap wOw Gold Look here! wow GoLd Store Welcome you! Look here to Buy WOw GOld, Cheap WOw golD, woW goLD Power Leveling,
buy Cheap WoW gold in here.

herwq (URL) said:
Written in a very wonderful ah, we provide all world of warcraft goldservices. for the precise analysis of wins, you can buy world of warcraft gold cheap world of warcraft gold here ! I think there will be many people concerned about this article, we provide all wow goldservices.and look forward to an equally exciting you can buy world of warcraft gold cheap wow gold here ! under the emergence of hope not waited too long

roxanna (URL) said:
Washington Post Reeling: Print Ads Down 22%, Online Growth Slowing To A Crawl70-620I'm stuffed. Isn't that great!

anderson (URL) said:
640-802 Washington Post Reeling: Print Ads Down 22%, Online Growth Slowing To A Crawl If you're not happy say it. Brag. He's bragging. There's no way he could do that.

John Smith said:
The premier seller of air jordans and buy jordans and information on acne.

Join the discussion