Yahoo Wilts as TechCrunch "Microsoft Takeover!" Sources Sober Up

|

sobrietytest.jpgAnyone else spoken to any Microsoft or Yahoo sources who think the two companies are discussing a full takeover deal? Everyone we've talked to thinks that TechCrunch's sources must have been drunk.

As for the "no talks of any kind" reports, a source familiar with the situation suggests that we ignore those, too. Specifically, the source would not confirm that Microsoft and Yahoo are again discussing a search deal, but the source also wouldn't deny it.

See Also: Microsoft and Yahoo Talking Again: Search Only, Not Buyout



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

30 Comments

hehateme said:
I think jerry is using microsoft buyout talks to keep yahoo stock above water until the new google deal gets done. Once jerry starts seeing google money kicking in he will finally dump microsoft.

Fernando Alvarez said:
Why are any talks of any kind on again. I postulate that the proxy cards have been coming in to withhold all nominees because I find it hard to believe it solely on the stock price.

hehateme, your asuming Jerry makes it past Aug. 1.

Dan said:
Why does anyone read TechCrunch? I stopped long ago after realizing all the information is both wrong and self-serving.

steve (URL) said:
there are a lot of underwater-longs stuck in YHOO and after the debacle created by Jerry, they are desperate to float any rumor that might prop up YHOO. Once she cracks under $20, watch out below!!

Likely it was institutional longs (Hedge Funds) who put ICahn up to his mischief. To try to save their errant speculation tails. just a "imho"!

Neek said:
We all know Yahoo is continuing to "wilt" (that in itself a gross understatement), but is there more info to substantiate this?

(Not saying there's anything wrong with the post, just interested in the amusement of seeing more direct evidence of this.)

Must be hard to be suffering from "founder-itis" when it's clear the fastest way out of this mess is to get the idiots at the top removed, and fast.

Silicon Valley Powerbroker said:
Everyone knows that Techcrunch is a joke. Arrington here in Silicon Valley is a laughingstock. He is pumping up his pageviews while beating up on anyone he thinks is competing with him.

Every blogger on the planet hates the guy and professional discount every word he writes. He is poison. Just look at his staff.

Techcrunch is the joke around the valley.

jenkins said:
I agree about TechCrunch. They have zero credibility.

David E said:
Has Icahn the bulldog been neutered? I rather enjoyed the daily barrage of a 20th century corporate raider trying to peddle his influence onto Yahoo and their pathetic board of directors.

His ego can be seen from space. I once saw him speak to a small group of people. Maybe 20-25 people. I couldn't get over how much he complimented himself.

His silence is deafening.

Joseph Hunkins (URL) said:
Henry do you think the SEC follows the blogging rumors and related trading? I do not think Arrington (or you or other market moving blogs) are trading on your posts, but would this be a legal gray area. If yes how common do you think this blog rumor trading might be ?

Andrew said:
FYI, you live in the wrong place (I just moved away, bit still know people). Nice try though. Good luck with forging real relationships in the valley.

[Also, delete this comment and we are done]

AAPLInvestor said:
Its pretty odd to go back and read TechCrunch's coverage of the MS/Yahoo thing the last couple weeks. They were relentlessly posting negative Yahoo articles (including negative Jerry Yang articles) blasting the deal failure...then once the stock fell to a bottom, suddenly popped up with a "DEAL IS BACK ON!" story?

On the rumors, if an investor were intentionally spreading false information via blogs, they'd be subject to the same rules as they would be for spreading it through any other medium (including IMs, which a trader was recently fined for).

TechCrunch said its sources were at Microsoft and Yahoo, so not sure the investment angle applies.

It makes sense for Yahoo to spread the rumor that talks are back on (so the stock pops)--and for Microsoft to deny this (so the stock tanks)--but all we've heard is categorical denials on both sides.

joeblow said:
This is not directed to Tech Crunch or about ANY particular rumor.
--

The most unfortunate thing about all these rumors are that the sources the reporters quote are anonymous and thus protected under freedom of the press provisions of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution.

Freedom of the Press was granted in the Bill of Rights to aid in the protection of human rights from an abusive government, not to slash and burn the property of shareholders regarding matters of no significance whatsover that relate to corporate corruption, illegality, or national or public security. A merger is simply a commercial contractual matter and the leakers of information regarding such should not be granted anonymity. That media is permitted to grant these leakers the status of anonymity is a great form of i-n-j-u-s-t-i-c-e, rather than just the opposite.

Do away with this senseless observation of the protections for mere commercial matters that are in no way related to life, liberty or the preservation of basic human rights, and you'd pretty quickly stop the T-H-E-F-T of property that is the primary motivation of many of these rumors.

I know anonymous sources are frustrating, and I wish there were a simple solution. Especially in business reporting, however, if you insisted on identifying everyone you talked to, you'd be limited to publishing press releases.

In my experience, especially in business, anyone who actually goes on the record has an agenda. Some background sources have an agenda, too, of course, but good journalists will understand that and filter out info that isn't ALSO worth reporting (There's nothing wrong with the source being advancing an agenda if the info is also interesting to readers).



Silicon Valley Henry Fan said:
Don't listen to the Arrington fans. People in Silicon Valley understand real reporting. You have fans in Silicon Valley.

Arrington's people are losers. He is tolerated only because he has an audience on his blog and everyone knows he will publish private emails and false statements for personal gain.

Arrington is dope and a money hungry fool. Recently he started a campaign to disgrace a very professional PR executive. He succeed to hurt this person financially. Arrington is a cyberbully. His blog sucks.

It is being talked about in Silicon Valley that he is under investigation for fraud.

joeblow said:
Henry,

I just don't think the privilege rises to the same level of significance that you do.

According to your theory of the protection of discussions between reporters and insiders, we should both eliminate the Chinese Wall and also allow insiders to discriminate when releasing materially significant shareholder information. Granting anonymity to leakers makes a mockery of both of these rules... and more.

So, either the SEC's charter, its purpose and rules can be ignored... or they can and should be enforced. It's a black and white issue from the perspective of the leaker.

I think what I'm saying is that the press has the right to f-i-n-d things out. I'm not opposed really to that... but this level of insignificance regarding the core reasons for protecting the anonymity of inside commentators is absurd. It'd be the identical thing to allowing a Benedict Arnold to sell out his country under protection of anonymity.

Marah Marie (URL) said:
joeblow,

Do you just copy and paste that blurb about anon sources from some folder on your computer or what? Word for word, jb, it is identical to the same thing you said two weeks ago and three months ago and back last winter...could you try mixing it up a little so it's not always the same stock paragraph?

"A merger is simply a commercial contractual matter and the leakers of information regarding such should not be granted anonymity."

Why not? Is your precious Y! stock going to brick on a rumor? If it does - granted, those scenarios can and will occur - is the public really that dumb that the stock will continue to brick for any serious length of time? Do we have to protect your stock by refusing anon sources anonymity? That's your answer? A little repressive, just to protect an investment, are you not?

someone says said:
What is it with TC/MA bashers? So much venom.

someone says said:
What is it with TC/MA bashers? So much venom.

joeblow said:
"...Word for word, jb, it is identical to the same thing you said two weeks ago and three months ago and back last winter." (end)
--
Thanks for noticing, MM. It's an important issue with me. What I said won't change and it's unrelated to my current or former position in any stock.


simlare said:
mp4 converter for mac allow you to trim videos, crop videos and apply special effects to videos.

Rosanna said:
Hi,there. There are two wonderful programmes in the current market i want to recommend to you , mac video converter and dvd ripper for mac. With these programmes, you can convert audios between audios and videos between videos without interruption.

UserName said:

Eric L. Prentis said:
With video cutter for mac,you can enjoy your favourite video clips at will.
With this easy-to-use m2v converter is designed to meet all your needs of converting M2V video format to other common formats.




welcome to wow gold,world of warcraft gold,warcraft gold,world of warcraft gold,wow leveling, the cheapWoW Power Leveling, service site,world of warcraft WoW Power Leveling,fast and secure service.we WoW Power Leveling, WoW gold isn’t found everywhere in the game; WoW Power Leveling,you have to look for it and, when you find it,WoW Gold, you have to save it.WoW Gold,WOW goldis earned through doing things like killing enemies, WoW Gold, hunting and crafting. WoW Gold, is for sale online at a number of locations. buy WoW Gold,The decision wow gold,wow gold to buy wow gold is one Cheap WoW Gold, that many video gamers wrestle with. Cheap WoW Gold,Many World of Warcraft players try to play the game on their own wow power level before making the decision to buy wow gold. Cheap WoW Gold,If you wow gold,want to buy Cheap WoW Gold,wow gold there is nothing wrong with it.WoW Gold, Buying wow gold is similar to finding cheat codes WoW Gold,World of warcraft Power Leveling,World of warcraft Power Leveling,age of conan gold,aoc gold,buy aoc gold,cheap aoc gold,aoc power leveling,age of conan power leveling,aoc power leveling,aoc gold,age of conan gold,age of conan power leveling,maplestory mesos, maple story mesos,maple story mesos,maple story mesos,maple story mesos,Maple Story mesos,MapleStory mesos,ms mesos,mesos,SilkRoad Gold,SRO Gold,SilkRoad Online Gold,eq2 plat,eq2 gold,eq2 Platinum,EverQuest 2 Platinum,EverQuest 2 gold,EverQuest 2 plat,lotro gold,lotr gold,Lord of the Rings online Gold,oil purifier,rolex replica,replica rolex,chongqing,yantai,evening dresses,evening gowns,wedding dresses,bridal gowns,wedding gowns,cocktail dresses,Bridesmaid dresses,prom dresses,formal dresses,Promotional items,Promotional products,Wedding dresses,Pet supplies,Dog clothes,Replica handbags,Replica Watches,wedding cake toppers,cake toppers,digital cameras,digital camera,warhammer online,war gold,digital cameras,digital camera,Mobile Phones,Mobile Phone,Cell Phones,Cell Phone,Mp3,world of warcraft power leveling,world of warcraft power leveling,power leveling wow,power leveling wow,power leveling wow,cheap wow power leveling,cheap wow power leveling,cheap wow power leveling,buy wow power leveling,buy wow power leveling,buy wow power leveling,power leveling,power leveling,power leveling,power level,power level,power level,

jeffrey (URL) said:
640-802 Yahoo Wilts as TechCrunch "Microsoft Takeover!" Sources Sober Up I knew it. You're a failure.

sesli chat (URL) said:
www.canimchat.com Видно что автор не обижен интеллектом

يعطيك الف عافي دليل - دليل - دليل - دليل - دليل - دليل - الكون وشكر لك

Join the discussion