Why Does RIM Have To Bribe BlackBerry Developers?

|

blackberry-bold.jpgNow official: The new BlackBerry Bold (aka the BlackBerry 9000, aka the BlackBerry not-really-an-iPhone killer), which RIM will show off his week at its annual Wireless Enterprise Symposium in Orlando.

What else is on RIM's (RIMM) agenda? A $150 million fund to invest in companies developing BlackBerry apps, with partners including RBC, Thomson Reuters, and JLA Ventures. This will compete with Apple's (AAPL) $100 million "iFund" for iPhone app development and Google's (GOOG) $10 million competition to entice people to develop apps for its upcoming Android platform.

The big difference: Unlike the iPhone and Android app platforms, which don't commercially exist yet, companies have been coding and distributing BlackBerry apps for years. In other words, it's one thing to offer some money to kick-start a brand new industry; it's another thing to pool a bunch of money to fuel an existing industry.

At the end of March, Apple had sold 5.4 million iPhones; RIM sold 14 million BlackBerries during fiscal 2008, leading the U.S. smartphone market. So in theory, the BlackBerry software industry should be large, mature, healthy -- and self-sustaining. Then why does RIM need to offer an incentive for coders to write for BlackBerry?

The most obvious conclusion: RIM is seriously worried about losing steam to Apple -- whose iPhone apps looked damn good in their video demo in March -- and Google, whose Android is unproven but will get a lot of attention when it launches later this year.

So, our query to mobile developers (or people who know them): Do you develop for BlackBerry now? Will you continue to? Or are the iPhone and Android platforms potentially more interesting/lucrative? Let us know in comments below.

See Also:
RIM's iPhone Killer: Not Terrible! But No iPhone
Blackberry's Newest iPhone Defense: SAP Deal
Apple iPhone, Google Android Could Pinch RIM's Growth: Analyst



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

35 Comments

Gordon said:
the best offense is a good defense. this is just good business. only the paranoid survive!

vaporland (URL) said:
The iPhone app platform does exist today. Version 1 is used by millions, and v2 does not ship until June, but developers are developing for it now, and the dev kit is available for free.

V2 iPhone is as viable as the BlackBerry 9000...

doug said:
If they want to spur development they could remove that asinine $100 fee they charge to do anything useful with their API.

Tantrum said:
Apple's advantage over RIMM in terms of application potential is insurmountable. RIMM shouldn't be going down this path. Their application potential is always going to be more modest and their phones serve a different set of needs from the iPhone.

Poor move.

Robert said:
Apple hasn't funded any startup fund as you intimated with the language. The iPhone software startup fund is completely independent, just announced at the SDK introduction in March.

RIM can see the future threat and is reacting in a "me too" fashion. Unfortunately, outside of e-mail they don't have much to brag about. With the iPhone 2.0 O.S. update, corporate services software, and 3G I can see Apple eclipsing RIM in sales' rate by the end of this year. Of course, corporate adoption takes time, which will give RIM until 2009 to respond. I doubt they'll succeed as they just don't have the resources to compete.

BlogReader said:
Doug: do they currently have a $100 fee? I thought that was removed.

But anyway their development tools are still painful. I would rather poke myself in the eye than used their late 90's throwback "JDE" IDE. And their Eclipse "plugin" is a complete joke, its like they took everything from the JDE and shoehorned it into Eclipse.

And why is rapc.exe, javaloader.exe, etc Windows only? If BB is serious about this $150M offer they better clean up their tools or people are going to try them out, get really frustrated, and not come back to BB development for years. Android development is a piece of cake. I'm sure iPhone is too. Why should I bang my head against a wall?

Harrison said:
The fund isn't just for RIM platform based applications, but rather for all mobile platforms/applications.

This from JL Albright's partner's blog:

"What Platforms?

All of them. No, really, all of them. Does that mean if somebody has an application on another mobile device but it isn't running on a RIM device we would fund them? Assuming it was a good investment, yes. We would expect the RIM devices to be on the roadmap and would certainly fund for that roadmap."

jbelkin said:
Is your reference to the $100 to Blackberry or to the iPhone - if you're referring to the iPhone, development is FREE unless you plan on distributing the app - then $99 is hardly onerous to be included in iTunes for either paid distribution or free distribution. THat's what Blackbery is missing - a unified delivery system and why after 10 years in the biz, they;re about to passed by Apple in year 2.

The bottom line is this - after 10 years, name ONE Blackberry app other than email?

Can't think of one? Yea, that's why Blackberry will be marginalized like push to talk - it's nice but outside of the niche market, no one cares. RIM had a chance but blew it.

Alex said:
Mobile *platforms* are the next frontier.

Both RIMM and Apple have great brands. What will be interesting to see is what price point the new BB 9000 is sold for. Considering that the rumor for the new iPhone will be $199 you better hope that the BB 9000 is in the same ballpark. Otherwise, it could be a long year for RIMM.


Desmond Haynes, Jr. (URL) said:
Some cool pics here:
http://techwatch.reviewk.com/2008/05/the-blackberry-bold-ex-9000-finally-arrives/

Steve (URL) said:
In a previous life, I've tackled BB coding. My recollections about it is that it was quite reminiscent of Java ME Palm programming (before all of the uproar about Waba-ification of various apps); similar to a lot of the issues surrounding limited screen resizing issues between thin clients, PDA clients, et al. between Palm, BB, and Symbian. As long as I didn't wander too much past standard CDC and CDLC aspects, I was fine.

Mucking around with the Android SDK reminds me a lot of creating a personal Web service or agent that merely happens to run on a single phone endpoint. I guess the channeling reminds me of the days when we all played around with the PointCast and Backweb back channels, even though it's supposed to be kinda a single bidirectional pipe. :)

I haven't gotten around to playing with the iPhone SDK yet, so I can't speak to that (yet). I'm unfortunately disheartened by lack of non-hacked JVM availability on the iPhone.

On the drive home, I think I heard something about the new BB being in the $400-500 price range. Does that help?

Keith (URL) said:
I'm not a coder, but part of the dev team in a well known indie mac software company. I also don't know what the Blackberry developing experience is like.

What I do have to bring is this: There are stacks of excellent Mac (and some PC) developers who are incredibly excited and working hard on iPhone apps. And there is a recent history of excellent indie applications coming out for the mac which are centered on ease-of-use, visual simplicity and often a niche set of features -- which pretty much describes what you want on a PDA/phone.

It's this '3rd party' which seems oft overlooked in comparisons.

Maredith said:
Anybody complaining about the $100 developer registration for the iPhone should look into how much it costs to develop BlackBerry applications -- and RIM doesn't even give you the hosting and sales.

Anne said:
The $99 fee for the iPhone is for distribution, not development, and seems largely to exist to minimise the number of "Hello World" apps in the iApps store.

Anthony said:
"The best offence is a good defence." Can't say I've ever heard that one before.

Silky (URL) said:
The most interesting thing for me, in the mobile dev area, is that our work relating to blackberries has been notoriously annoying and filled with security issues, etc.

The general feeling has been that blackberry is against 'outside' app development [i.e. you need to get in the inner circle first and install in a special way, etc].

It's a little odd that they suddenly want to be so open. Good, but odd.

Jon said:
If the $99 for Apple distro is a problem for you, you're not a developer. At best a pre-teen scriptkiddie...

Ted T. said:
I know of several people who are wildly exited about and coding diligently on their iPhone apps. People exited about RIM or Android development? Maybe they exist, but I haven't encountered any.

Quote: I'm unfortunately disheartened by lack of non-hacked JVM availability on the iPhone.

Apple, please keep JVMs off the iPhone to save us from people re-cycling their mobile apps onto the iPhone. Anyone, in any way serious about iPhone development will use the native tools.



BirdEye (URL) said:
Looks workable, but iPhon design is a king.

Steve (URL) said:
@Silky:

Yes, if you're doing internal corporate development, it's like creating a stripped down version of your cross-platform apps, so the conversion issues between Java SE to Java ME still exist. At the time, I was in the unenviable position of redesigning an app suite I had created (earlier for desktop usage) into something used on Palms, Symbians, and BB's.

From a commercially available perspective, Apple's and Google's stances on providing access to their SDKs is very important toward building up a developer mindshare. Fairly cute and amusing to play with the SDKs from both, although without shipping Android-compatible phones, it's a bit tricky to see how well the new Android apps will work.

One thing that isn't discussed much is that the Android SDK can be used on anything that provides a compatible stack. It's not much of a stretch for somebody to decide to have a multifunction stereo alarm clock that starts throwing up a bunch of chat screens and a PiP MMOG viewer on a 72" bedroom LCD TV. ;)


@Ted T.:

Don't worry, according to Sun, they're working on providing an official JVM for the iPhone. It'd be hilarious to get the JVM iPhone, and then start deploying Android apps on iPhones.



As an Apple fan, I'd happily get a Bold so long as Rogers isn't the service provider.

joetunn said:
RIMM will follow the footsteps of PALM

Arrain said:
"Apple's advantage over RIMM in terms of application potential is insurmountable"
You can't even get the names of the companies involved right, so I doubt you're an expert on the subject.

"Considering that the rumor for the new iPhone will be $199"
And your service provider will only charge you $5/month for unlimited everything too!
It might be $199 with a 16 year service agreement, but it will not be under $300 without one.

lausen said:
Brand new Mobile phone Plasma tv , Laptop game at cheap price comes with complete accessories with one year international warranty.

Email address : applemac_inc@hotmail.com

BlackBerry Bold 9000..$300usd
HTC Touch Diamond.....$350usd
NOKIA N95 8GB....$350USD
IPHONE 16GB……$350USD
iPHONE 8GB……..$300USD
IPOD 32GB.........$280USD
PS3 60GB……....$300USD
SONY ERICSSON XPERIA X1.........$350USD

Bold 9000, has features that include:
HSDPA and EV-DO versions
480 x 320 LCD screen
625MHz processor
1GB internal memory
802.11a/b/g Wi-i
Bluetooth 2.0 with A2DP for wireless stereo headphones support
GPS
microSD HC slot
480 x 320 video recording
Photo geotagging
4.5 x 2.6 x 0.55-inches, 4.7 ounces

AND MANY MORE…………

WE MAKE SHIPMENT VIA UPS AND FEDEX SHIPPING COMPANY 2DAYS DELIVER , IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN BUYING CONTACT US.

Email address: applemac_inc@hotmail.com

Chris Hall said:
You mean like Apple Corp does?

LOL

Chaz said:
With well over 2,000,000 developers on the .NET platform, RIM seems to be courting the right crowd. This year, the BlackBerry development tools for .NET improved by light years, compared to where they were last year at this time.

Apple charges developers. Google seems to have a better strategy with Android. But in my mind, RIM is going the extra mile to attract Java and .NET developers with robust tools, and real-world application frameworks.

Apple will have pretty icons and fun home applications, but RIM will clean up in the Enterprise development arena.



welcome to wow gold,world of warcraft gold,warcraft gold,world of warcraft gold,wow leveling, the cheapWoW Power Leveling, service site,world of warcraft WoW Power Leveling,fast and secure service.we WoW Power Leveling, WoW gold isn’t found everywhere in the game; WoW Power Leveling,you have to look for it and, when you find it,WoW Gold, you have to save it.WoW Gold,WOW goldis earned through doing things like killing enemies, WoW Gold, hunting and crafting. WoW Gold, is for sale online at a number of locations. buy WoW Gold,The decision wow gold,wow gold to buy wow gold is one Cheap WoW Gold, that many video gamers wrestle with. Cheap WoW Gold,Many World of Warcraft players try to play the game on their own wow power level before making the decision to buy wow gold. Cheap WoW Gold,If you wow gold,want to buy Cheap WoW Gold,wow gold there is nothing wrong with it.WoW Gold, Buying wow gold is similar to finding cheat codes WoW Gold,World of warcraft Power Leveling,World of warcraft Power Leveling,age of conan gold,aoc gold,buy aoc gold,cheap aoc gold,aoc power leveling,age of conan power leveling,aoc power leveling,aoc gold,age of conan gold,age of conan power leveling,maplestory mesos, maple story mesos,maple story mesos,maple story mesos,maple story mesos,Maple Story mesos,MapleStory mesos,ms mesos,mesos,SilkRoad Gold,SRO Gold,SilkRoad Online Gold,eq2 plat,eq2 gold,eq2 Platinum,EverQuest 2 Platinum,EverQuest 2 gold,EverQuest 2 plat,lotro gold,lotr gold,Lord of the Rings online Gold,oil purifier,rolex replica,replica rolex,chongqing,yantai,evening dresses,evening gowns,wedding dresses,bridal gowns,wedding gowns,cocktail dresses,Bridesmaid dresses,prom dresses,formal dresses,Promotional items,Promotional products,Wedding dresses,Pet supplies,Dog clothes,Replica handbags,Replica Watches,wedding cake toppers,cake toppers,digital cameras,digital camera,warhammer online,war gold,digital cameras,digital camera,Mobile Phones,Mobile Phone,Cell Phones,Cell Phone,Mp3,world of warcraft power leveling,world of warcraft power leveling,power leveling wow,power leveling wow,power leveling wow,cheap wow power leveling,cheap wow power leveling,cheap wow power leveling,buy wow power leveling,buy wow power leveling,buy wow power leveling,power leveling,power leveling,power leveling,power level,power level,power level,

missy (URL) said:
640-802 Why Does RIM Have To Bribe BlackBerry Developers? Treat it with respect.Have respect for someone. Don't even think about it.


air jordan (URL) said:
WoW Gold Store here! Buy WoW Gold, Cheap WoW Gold

wholesale air force one (URL) said:
Nike shoes kids,Nike Shox,Nike Air Max,Nike Dunks,Nike Air Force One,Nike Sb.

srgaer said:
Nike Air Max,Nike retro air jordans,Nike Air Force One,Nike Sb.

John Fassullo (URL) said:
wow gold http://www.mmoga.com
MMOGA mediates virtual goods for online games within 1-24 hours. Offers don´ t only consist of the latest games, items, WoW powerleveling, WoW gold but WoW accounts and much more. Furthermore we have currencies for plenty top online games like Silkroad Gold, Guild Wars Platin, Eve ISK, Lotro Gold, AOE Gold and many more.
In addition we offer prepaid game cards for many games. Multilingual competent team, we are your MMORPG´s partner.

Join the discussion