Microsoft-Yahoo (YHOO): Has Microsoft (MSFT) Really Walked Away?
Did Microsoft (MSFT) really walk away from the Yahoo (YHOO) deal? Or was the weekend's behavior just yet another negotiating tactic? Or, more importantly, if it wasn't intended to be a negotiating tactic, will it become one, as Yahoo's shareholder rebellion grows?
Despite Yahoo's suggestion to the contrary, we have yet to hear from a single Yahoo shareholder who publicly supports Yahoo's board's decision to hold fast at $37. Legg Mason's Bill Miller, once Yahoo's biggest supporter in the quest for a higher bid, seems dismayed. Employees seem dismayed. The market seems dismayed.
And no wonder: Yahoo has made every point it can in its insistence that $31 "substantially undervalues" the company, and despite all of this--including the much-ballyhooed Google search partnership--and the market still says Yahoo is worth all of $22.
It doesn't seem inconceivable that, over the next few days, Yahoo shareholders will effectively insist that negotiations be re-opened--in which case, Microsoft will have "gone hostile" without going hostile, just by walking away. And if negotiations are reopened as a result of shareholder unrest, of course, the advantage will have shifted overwhelmingly to Microsoft.
See Also: Yahoo: Out of Touch




This is just some drama for the skeptics and a show for the regulators
And whatever happened to the considerations that employees would walk under a MSFT deal? Any sense that MSFT was just screwing w the firm would be met with resignation (by those who can't jump ship) at best, and with a resignation by those who can.
General Motors built one H of a business by consolidating the hundred or so small auto manufacturers; it lasted about 50 years. I don't see how MSFT has the luxury in a space defined by hot trends, instant exchange of news & ideas, and ultra-low barriers to entry.
Whatever MSFT's original intentions, this has been a useful exercise in re-examining assumptions about franchise value, etc. Not good news for YHOO.
And from another perspective: Merger/Acquisition deals tend to fall apart in weak markets, as either the purchase price or the value of the acquiree is called into question. (You see this in the returns of Merger Arb hedge funds... they look like selling puts on the S&P.) Both valuations were volatile here, plus we have a lot of uncertainty about the economic growth going forward. It's hardly surprising that this deal failed. All the churn means it'd be foolhardy to try it again, at least within a year.
This is more than you are making from your ads, I bet (not that I see them anyway).
Actually, forget the 20 bucks, it's easier to skip the articles :)
custom lapel pins, badge pins
Silk flower
MP3 Players
oyun
chat
chat
sesli chat
chat
tatil
kolonyali mendil
kolonyali mendil
islak mendil
paketleme
ambalajlama
refreshing towel
paket
chat
msn
Chat
toplist
mirc
Chat
Sohbet
Muhabbet
Sohbet
Kelebek
Thank you
Hosting
web Hosting
Domain
irc Hosting