Microsoft and Yahoo Price Talk in "Mid-$30s"; Deal Odds "50-50"

|

ballmerfists.jpg

Microsoft and Yahoo are still negotiating. Price talk is said to be in the "mid-$30s range". Given that two days ago the bid/ask was $33-$37, this likely means $34-$35. The New York Times says the odds of reaching a deal are still no better than 50-50.

*UPDATE: The WSJ confirmed our earlier assumption: Microsoft has been silent because Microsoft and Yahoo are now negotiating seriously about consummating a friendly deal. Microsoft has raised its bid "by several dollars."

According to the WSJ, a "deal was not imminent and the people familiar with the matter said an agreement was not likely on Friday. The people cautioned that the talks could fail to produce an accord."

The NYT adds that Microsoft has increased its price by "several dollars". Yahoo's stock, which has been climbing all day, has now spiked.

EARLIER: Some folks seem to be under the impression that Microsoft (MSFT) is having trouble making up its mind about what to do about Yahoo (YHOO) and that that's why we haven't heard anything.

Please.

The silence suggests that two companies are negotiating furiously behind the scenes. The fact that CNBC's David Faber was able to report this morning that we won't hear anything until the weekend (if then) suggests that the companies have found--or are close to finding--common ground.

In fact, the longer the silence lasts, the more likely we are to get a deal. The companies are very close--$33 and $37, per the Journal--so a deal seems likely even without serious negotiations. But at this point, if there were any true deal-killers on either side, Microsoft already would have walked (or gone hostile or whatever).

See Also: Now Microsoft "Leaning Hostile" (But Doesn't Reject $35-$37 Price)

< Prev. Story
Next Story >

45 Comments

jasonious said:
Wow. This is getting pathetic. I'm embarrassed for MS at this point. It's hard to believe that this was the company that instilled such fear in the 90's. I think Yahoo! can smell the desperation at this point.

This all sounds like typical Microsoft. In almost all of their recent negotiations, everything happened via back channels and meetings while everyone else sat there waiting. Then all of a sudden they are spending $500 million here, $6 billion there and I'm sure Yahoo will be the same.

A lot of marbles on the floor, and the last thing they want is someone coming in knocking them out. Forcing businesses, and regular Joes to buy the new flavor of Windows and Office just doesn't work like it used to.

You used to need a new OS to be able to use certain hardware and games, now everything works great with XP and people are having mixed results with getting hardware to work with Vista. The only real benefit I saw for Office was Excel being able to handle 1MM lines instead of 65k. If you're a business that isn't affected by this - you're probably not springing for this. Now, Microsoft is a jack of all trades, and Google is holding the Ace.

I can only hope that somewhere someone is planning on how to do Mobile right. The opportunity and revenue is huge is Microsoft can provide a platform, advertising model, and get partners. They did it with Windows 3.1, but that seems like a different company.

Prediction - May 13th buyout at $34.25, same amount of cash, but more stock and MSFT finds a way to reissue more shares to cover the spread.

Smith said:

Steve Ballmer is the George W Bush of business.

Incompetent, unaware, a record that speaks for itself.

Henry will you PLEASE write an article analyzing his performance as CEO -- specifically, stock price vs. revenue growth, why Ballmer is apparently determined to keep the stock price FLAT.

Why does he survive? Where is the outrage from MSFT investors who have no return across his entire tenure, despite quite respectable rise in revenues?

Thanks

Tim F. said:
Close? 4 dollars sounds close; 5 billion dollars -- not so much.

Gordon said:
i'm outraged.

me said:
It's bad to go from a monopoly topdog to become an Internet underdog. I feel you Mr. B.

chucko said:
is it too late for a partnership?

like somehow splitting revenue on some new search initiatives with invested capital from microsoft and in exchange yahoo gives microsoft it's small business channel to help push live office.



Kenneth Hartog said:
Henry,
Remarkably, I completely agree. It looks like it's gonna be $33-35. Hostile or not, makes very little difference. It's not as if Yahoo has an excellent management team that would be a major loss if they left.
I expect an announcement this weekend, probably Sunday night.
Now where do you put the odds of MSFT walking away?

Haha said:
they are not close and negotiating anything. It's all clear: raise offer and we start talking. MSFT is just waiting for the right moment to make a higher offer... Nothing else to talk about.

Basil said:
Where on earth do you get such wonderful shots of Balmer?

Kenneth Hartog said:
Henry or Anybody else with an opinion,
Assuming a deal is announced this weekend around $34, where does MSFT open and close on Monday?
My guess, open $28.75, close $30.50

Montecristo said:
31 open ... 32 close

Depends on specifics...cash / shares portions


Brilliant MSFT moves. YAHOO executives don't even know that Balmer controls the situation. It seems that Microsoft will open with $30+ on Monday.

vax said:
But the real question is if the MS-hating system admins at Yahoo will just type in a few unix commands like

rm * -rf

(erase everything)

on their last day at work....


Don Johson said:
Believe the longer this takes the less likely this gets done short term. I liked this deal when I first heard it, made a lot of sense, but my initial reaction long gone, and now as the 2 companies extend the process it serves as a sober reminder these are two dysfunctional companies. Neither has not done anything great in years, and the combination will not help either change their ways. I keep thinking of the two web grocers who merged and are gone, two wrongs do not make a right (yes very different in many ways but you get the point). I suspect MSFT, although desperate for something, anything, for future growth also knows the substantial risks and will not do the deal unless it's at a good price. Since the process has been dragged out, serving to remind MSFT of their own as well as Yahoo's foibles, they get cold feet, pull the bid and try again later. Why not? Yahoo at 29.4 in after hours right now disputing my thinking, but we shall see soon.

Yo Momma said:
Hey Illusionist (if you're out there),

Assuming the headlines are true, do you still think msft has played it perfectly from an M&A perspective? Or do they just look a complete horse's ass at this point? I know where my vote is.

Personally, I would walked away Sunday or Monday morning. Yhoo stock would have tanked, shareholders would have been up in arms, etc, etc. They could have come back a month later and picked them up for <$30/share easily. Done deal...

Seriously, you're impressed? That Ballmer dude is obsessed and possessed. I just hope it costs him his job and his legacy one day but I'm sure he'll be laughing all the way to the bank while he f'ed all of his employees (and probably yhoo's too).

Neek said:
Step back a little and it's amazing how everybody and their dogs are pegging this as a disaster and listing AOL/TWX and other merger failures as examples as if that made any difference when there were also successes so you might as well include that too (whatever side is more or less is regardless).

Thing is, when it comes to stuff online, Google rules, and the longer they try to work it out, the farther and farther away they get (especially for MS). It isn't just the revenue, but the share of mind.

They need Yahoo! for that share of mind and even beyond $44B it's still a bargain.

I'd personally have preferred they went after SAP if only for the much more profitable enterprise market. But the cachet and power of owning the consumer space has always been a key ingredient to the MS recipe.


When the smoke clears, No. 2 is always eventually going to be more and more distant. No. 3 is even worse, and that's where MS is at, and the only way they can survive for mindshare, let alone close the gap, is with Yahoo!

They can afford it.

Yo Momma said:
Neek,

Dude, share of mind??? If "share of mind" doesn't provide top and bottom line growth then it can kiss my ass.

me said:
I guess the deal will be sealed at the BRK meeting where Bill and Sue meet.

I would like to see MicroHoo kicks Google's butt!

Google is becoming too big and too evil.

Neek said:
Yo Momma Holla,

Dude! Exactly like you said-- "share of mind" (and a basket of related goodies from your business classes) DOES eventually provide top and bottom line growth, and ultimately, the sustainable kind like you've seen GOOG do to these guys so well, and as MS had done repeatedly before such as in leveraging OS dominance into office suites and all sorts of monopoly-happy returns.

All the more reason why they want this one bad for long term gratification.

Ahmad said:
Just a question, Is MS stock going up or down by this. since MS will offer half cash/half stock (.95 of MS stock)

So, can someone explain.

Smith, I totally disagree with you. Steve Ballmer knows what he's doing. I do not care about Bush anyway....

risk:reward said:
if msft is not willing to pay at least high 30s, then yhoo partners with goog and msft will be eclipsed forever on the web.

don't think so?

just watch.

The illusionist said:
Yo Momma,
Nothing has changed my view, if you go back to my earlier threads you'll see that I've all along maintained that MSFT will raise to $34 and that Yahoo's silence was a clear indication of ongoing talks.

I never believed that MSFT will simply walk, not raise or go hostile without showing its “second” offer.

Everything to this point made reasonable M&A gamesmanship sense except Yahoo's persistent leaks of its warped sense of self-worth!

I liquidated my bets yesterday with a small profit even though I had a strong conviction that that position would have been very profitable at anything north of $32. I did so because I felt that the one intangible here was Yahoo pushing its luck to the point where MSFT would have no choice but to go hostile. To me that would have been akin to betting on a coin toss and as a matter of principal, I don't bet on coin tosses (that famous scene from No Country For Old Men, notwithstanding).

Forget the media leaks and especially people that claim they have access to "sources familiar with the negotiations." Everything you need to figure this one out will be reflected in the price of both stocks next week.

Those “Sources Familiar with the Negotiations,” influence the price long before they talk to anyone that cares to write about this charade.

On what happens to MSFT stock it’s a hard call on how it behaves post announcement, I think it “falls” (the grumpy-nerds effect) initially then “rises” (yippee, we’re number two) then gradually drifts lower (the Holly $hit they really paid $50bb for that piece of junk! effect).

Gordon said:
the only people that want this deal to go through are the pathetic, desperate, disgusting, filthy yahoo shareholders.

thomasw said:
Hello Henry -

Outstanding coverage of the Microsoft | Yahoo situation. Thanks!

Would be wonderful to see an agreement this weekend - at least before the opening bell on Monday. Throughout this event, I have become more impressed with Jerry Yang and his ability to one-up Microsoft. The potential ad deal with Google was the ultimate trigger that pulled this into action. I was very doubtful when he pulled the $2B severance package deal and basically ignored the Microsoft bid. Meanwhile behind the scenes he has been cooking up ways to not only bolster the MS bid, but to enhance stockholder value by working with Google - something he knows all too well would make Steve B. curse and hyperventilate.

I would like to see agreement @ $35/share. Hoping we'll know more this weekend.

lanta said:
I'm afraid that Ballmer's legacy will be ruined if he can't pull this off. The future of Microsoft is at stake: whether it will be, or will not be, a force to be reckoned with on the internet. It may be to late, but perhaps he can convince the Microsoft board that they should be satisfied remaining just a software company. Then it wouldn't matter that this last chance slipped through his fingers.

Messa said:
Wrong, Gordon.....Steve Ballmer wants it to go through too.....BAAAAAAAAHAHAHA.

P.S. I hope you get your little whining bitch ass handed to you too...:)

even if MSFT is able to convince the Y! board to go along with this, there are a lot of hurdles to go. I put the chance of this deal getting all the approvals and closing at 40% Andreeseen had a good post about some of the concerns earlier today http://blog.pmarca.com/2008/05/examining-micro.html

Oli Burgess said:
I wanna say thanks as well Henry. I've really found your coverage and analysis excellent.

Dan Bartlett said:
Besides being long YHOO, I want the deal to go thru so we can all see videos of sweaty Ballmer on stage yodeling the Yahoo! yodel to the beat of "developers, developers..." ;) (Sorry, Gordon.)

Former MS employee speaking. MS has the habit of buying a company and making them adapt to the MS way of doing things. If they do this with Yahoo we will be living in a Google-Only world.

Not sure if anyone knows, but outside the US it is nearly impossible to do 2 searches in a row in English. The first will work, the second will default to local language - making it nearly impossible to find American sites.

Yo Momma said:
Richard,

"Former MS employee speaking. MS has the habit of buying a company and making them adapt to the MS way of doing things."

Ummm, why would it be beneficial to have it any other way? Assuming 100% acquisitions, you can't buy a bunch of companies and allow them to continue to do it their way. You have to conform to a common culture, set of processes, etc. It simply doesn't scale. If your desire is to leave the acquired company completely in tact then why not just buy a controlling interest, not a 100% acquisition?

I'm also an ex-employee and would actually disagree with your statement to a degree. Msft takes a very hands-off approach initially (first 2 years). I've worked for at least 3 different hi-tech companies known for having a number of hi-profile acquisitions. I would say that Msft is by far the slowest and the worst at integrating the acquired company. I was disappointed in what I experienced.

iknow (really) said:
jerry won't sell for less than $40. he'd rather have it go hostile even if it looks like he'll lose. guaranteed no friendly at the $36 MSFT offer, rather it will be taken to shareholders.

Rav said:
Guys, here is the complete text of Ballmer's remarks dealing with the current deal, at the Microsoft town hall meeting.

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/789019/000119312508100726/d425.htm

Read carefully the part dealing with the so called 3 options. Note that first he talks about two big options and then changes it to three. Also he doesn't seem too enthusiastic about the unfriendly deal. The third option to walk away just seems like an afterthought.

It seems like MSFT will try very hard to do a friendly deal. So far all the leaks that we got in media seem to be coming from MSFT. The only one coming out of YHOO is about doing a deal with GOOG next week. I haven't seen anybody at YHOO confirming that the range they are looking at is $34-36 or $33-37. I agree with previous comment that Yang won't take anything below $40 in a friendly deal. Note that he has just talked about deal with GOOG. Once he actually announces something next week, he would have even more leverage.

I believe that one of those or both will happen - either MSFT goes hostile and/or YHOO announces GOOG deal, before there is an agreement on price between YHOO and MSFT. Note that the sense of urgency is on MSFT's side and its not apparent on YHOO's side. This means that the deal would either get done close to YHOO's asking price or not get done at all. Now that big YHOO shareholders know that MSFT is willing to pay ~$35, that is the bottom line even if it goes hostile. MSFT might as well pay a few bucks more than go hostile, based on Ballmer's comments.


I would like to hear other thoughts based on Ballmer's remarks at the town hall meeting.

Randall L said:
If the MSFT-YHOO deal goes through, then immediately install Jerry Yang as the MS CEO and put that sweaty, screaming eunuch Ballmer out to pasture. If Yang gets $33, 34, 35 or whatever increased from MSFT, then full kudos to him for playing Ballmer.

Ahmad said:
Important head-up: All what we hear is that MS is welling to raise the offer few dollars but we did not hear that YAHOO agreed or accepted (even by hinting to agree)?? that simply means 3 options are still open. I personally thought that walking away is option #1 but when I read SB letter, I was convinced that MS needs to buy Yahoo badly.

Why is Yahoo quite???

FlyManWalker said:
YHOO's price will make MSFT walk.

YHOO announces advt partnership with GOOG.

YHOO's shareholders and insititutions will not dump stock if MSFT walks.

YHOO's shares barely move from current levels.

All the longs and shorts are screwed who were betting huge fortunes for either significant up or down movements.

Market makers celebrate! Champagne bottles open. Out walk Yang and Ballmer smiling into the party and they are serenaded and rewarded by the market makers.

Another day on wall street and general public (AKA suckers) skinned again by the elite.

Victor said:
Whatever happens the only truly profitable play is to buy GOOG. Msft and Yhoo are going to kill each other.

Rav said:
Amen! Might want to add - "Msft and Yhoo are going to kill each other, with help from GOOG."

Gordon said:
Microsoft succeeds by sticking around, stalking a market, until the opposition shoots itself in the foot and then they pounce. The don't kill companies so much as help them commit suicide.

The illusionist said:
Actually, I think that if Microsoft does a good job managing the Yahoo assets (identity branding will be a major hurdle here), Google will find itself fighting a truly formidable foe rather than a rag-tag collection of Silicon Valley dreamers.

Because, beyond their juggernaut on monetizing search, Google has not produced any single innovation worthy of note, yet!!

Their Google Earth and Map products, were bought, their successful video offering was bought as well and everything with a professional bend around advertising they bought too!! Froogle, Gmail, Google Apps.. yada yada yada are all laughable imitations of other's work.

So for all of you Google lovers out there (and I know this is like talking religion to you) please point me to one real "innovation" worthy of all the hype that you like to bestow on Google as the unattainable God you make it out to be. I think that they are ripe for the taking and a stronger Microsoft scares them (or should) than they ought to.

I actually believe that Microsoft will be better off and Google worse off, post takeover.

DL said:
Honestly, the deal is MSFT will raise the price to somewhere between $33-$35.....but I don't believe yahoo is going to accept any deals within this range. It was clear since the deal was announced, that Jerry Yang clearly wants the Yahoo deal to be at 50 billion ($37 per share) or somewhere close to it. If you were to look at the initial deal of $31 per share or 44.6 billion anounced in Feb 1, 2008, this price was based on MSFT trading around $31. At the current market price for MSFT ($29.12) and an increase of the Yahoo price to $35 a share (which I consider the high end of the yahoo takeover) will not be close to Jerry Yang's expection. The main reason is as follow: when MSFT announce the deal at $35, MSFT shares will DROP. Also, I believe Jerry Yang believes MSFT needs Yahoo more, therefore, he would wants to get the max. Unfortunately, I don't think this deal will be more than $35, because if MSFT wanted to buy YAHOO for 50 billion, this deal would have been done a few months ago. Ultimately, I feel MSFT will walk away and come back with a lower offer in the future, or Steve Ballmer announces a ALL CASH DEAL frothe purchase of yahoo.

DL said:
I was right

DL said:
Look forward to MSFT to open 32.50, and close to $35.00 at the end of the day.


Home
About Us
About Our Services www.nicolascleansoc.com
Promotions
Contact Us
Admin Access
Welcome to Nicolas Cleans OC!

We are a licensed and insured cleaning services provider.




Our friendly staff has been providing our Orange County customers with cleaning services for residential dwellings and commercial properties since 2003.

We specialize in providing affordable, reliable cleaning and maintenance services for:

+ Commercial: Office Buildings, Office Suites, Construction Job Site Clean-Up, Janitorial/Maintenance.

+ Residential: House, Condominium, Apartment, Rental Property, Vacation Property.

We offer flexible scheduling with competitive rates available for weekly, bi-weekly, and monthly service and maintenance, depending on your needs and budget.

Ask us about our 24-Hour cleaning services. We're available for around-the-clock service as needed!!!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you have a question about our cleaning services? Please contact us by e-mail for more information. Or, call 949-573-1117 (office), or 949-842-7598 (cell/voice mail) to schedule a FREE CONSULTATION.
OUR PROMOTIONS
$70 FIRST-TIME RESIDENTIAL CLEANING: Includes - Two (2) Rooms plus FREE cleaning in the following areas: Kitchen (Outside oven, refrigerator); Single Bathroom

Print and present the online coupon to a supervisor at time of initial in-home consultation to receive this special online promotional discounted rate.

Please click here or see our "Promotions" link above for more details.


OUR CUSTOMERS SAY:
"Fantastic service...always courteous...we recommend this company to anyone."

OUR GUARANTEE:
With the stress and pressures everyone endures on a daily basis (long work hours, social commitments, family), we understand that cleanliness and organization is an important factor for maintaining quality of life.
Therefore, we will stand by our guarantee and honor our original quote provided upon initial consultation, no matter the condition of the area(a) we are expected to clean and maintain.

Please contact us by e-mail or call 949-573-1117 for more information about our guarantee and related policies.

nicolas@nicolascleansoc.com

Join the discussion


Type the characters you see in the picture above (just to make sure you're a human).
All Content © 2007-2008 Silicon Alley Insider, Inc