The New York Post is Full of Sh**--TechCrunch

|

TechCrunch declares war on sloppy journalism, blasting the New York Post for running a titillating story about how Microsoft (MSFT) has been unable to find anyone willing to be a Yahoo (YHOO) dissident director. In fact, TechCrunch says, it talked to a Yahoo dissident director (unnamed), who ridiculed the idea that anyone in Silicon Valley cares what Jerry Yang or Yahoo thinks of them anymore.

According to TechCrunch, Microsoft's dissident slate is all set to go. Microsoft is just waiting for the appropriate moment to bean Yahoo over the head with it.

Erick Schonfeld:

The sad truth is that nobody is afraid of Jerry Yang or any other Yahoo insiders (what’s left of them). While the Post may have uncovered some individuals who may have been considered for the alternate board and declined, that is not the same as evidence “that the software giant actually doesn’t have anyone lined up.” Because, in fact, Microsoft does have an alternate board lined up and the people chosen for it have agreed to serve if called upon to do so. We have confirmed this with a member of the alternate board.

So why hasn’t Microsoft released its proposed slate? It is not because it cannot find anyone to serve on it. More likely, the reason that Microsoft has gone dark is because it is deep in negotiations with Yahoo to close the deal. The expectation for a revised bid of $34 a share or more is well-founded. If a deal is imminent, there is no point in doing something hostile like propose a new slate of directors. The absence of a slate actually means the chances of the deal going through are high. If Microsoft does decide to reveal the slate in the next few days, then you’ll know the negotiations aren’t going well.

erickschonfeld.jpg

Appalled by sensational journalism.

 

See Also: Microsoft-Yahoo Takeover Glitch: Microsoft Can't Find Yahoo Dissident Board Members



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

8 Comments

Shi* said:
I wonder when we will see someone out there correct your posts, majority of which are full of shi*

Henry Blodget said:
We will happily and quickly correct any factual errors--and are grateful to readers for pointing them out. We'll stick with our opinions, though (unless/until evidence persuades us otherwise).

VINCENT said:
Sh** is everything said by wall street gurus and techs gurus. The truth about Microsoft (MSFT) being unable to find anyone willing to be a Yahoo (YHOO) dissident director will be known sooner or later.

Nowbody deserves to be paid for writing what if´s? what is the point of it? Having access to what?

Recommendations: read a bit of Andre Kostolany before opening your big mouths.

KeepPlugging! said:
H

Ignore the naysayers. You are more right than wrong, and have shown a willingness to apply corrections/updates. You, Digg, and Google News are my first three clicks of the day (and you and your team have worked hard to earn that slot).

Tom said:
Can't imagine why it is hard to find a bunch of candidates of the willing... I mean Jerry Levin and Steve Case aren't all that busy at this moment right?

yankini said:
I wonder which idiot wants 15-day fame! The dissident director's role is just one day- on the day of shareholder's meeting where they vote for a buy. As soon as that happens the directors are ousted because there won't be a yahoo. So, what are the incentives? Microsoft isn't known for great paychecks! They may have found some CEOS who were ousted for not doing a good job, but then who will listen to them?



Join the discussion