Next New Networks: $15 Million Second Round From Goldman, Velocity For Video "Micronetwork"

|

Yesterday we wondered whether Next New Networks was still raising a second round. Not any more: The Web video network has closed a $15 million Series B, led by Goldman Sachs and Velocity Interactive Group, whose Jon Miller was already a NNN board member. Spark Capital, Haim Saban and Bob Pittman's Pilot Group, who were all part of the company's $8 million Series A, have all reupped. No word on valuation but we'll update if we get an estimate.

We've been skeptical about the Web video industry for some time, and expect a shakeout to commence sooner than later. If NNN is going to survive it's going to have start ramping up both distribution and revenue, but the company says it's doing just that: It began a real sales effort in Q4, and is now boasting of big jump in eyeballs. It says it generated 100 million video views in 2007 and says that's accelerating rapidly; NNN says it racked up 33 million views in February alone.

 

< Prev. Story
Next Story >

3 Comments

insider said:
will someone please explain what exactly is a "video view"?

no disprects to NNN, who i believe is only doing their jobs, but this sounds like yet another metric that appears impressive but has little or no meaning in the real world

i mean, in a "video view", does a person actually watch an entire video? or is a "video view" that lasts ten seconds reported the same as one that watches a minute?

how about broken streams/downloads? if a video is started is it automatically counted even if it is not delivered completely?

etc.

nielsen's TV ratings are lame, but at least they stiff everybody more or less the same. relying on a company to report its own metrics is a recipe for ruin. and its even worse when the self-reporting is not required to adhere to any accepted third-party standards or measures

Peter Kafka said:
That's a totally reasonable question, insider. I assume they're the same thing as "steams" - though I wonder why they don't call them that.

I'll ask.

James Gerber said:
Not sure, but the programming and the design of the website would have been cool 3 years ago. There are a lot of sites out there that do the overall experience better.

Join the discussion


Type the characters you see in the picture above (just to make sure you're a human).
All Content © 2007-2008 Silicon Alley Insider, Inc