Jon Miller Trying To Raise Money To Buy Yahoo (YHOO)*

|

jon miller kung fu aol.jpgFormer AOL CEO Jon Miller is trying to raise money to buy Yahoo, says the WSJ.  A great idea at this price, but probably tough to raise the money for a full buyout at the $20-$22 mentioned below.  There's another option, though...

WSJ: Mr. Miller has been talking to private equity investors and sovereign wealth funds for months in hopes of raising money for a Yahoo deal, and it is unclear whether the talks have progressed or are just continuing, these people say. Mr. Miller believes he can do a deal that would be worth around $20 to $22 a share to Yahoo shareholders, these people say, which would involve raising about $28 billion to $30 billion to purchase the entire company.

Sources close to Yahoo expressed deep skepticism that Mr. Miller would succeed in lining up investors.

Indeed, given banks' reluctance to lend money right now, financing a deal of this size would be extremely difficult, even from deep-pocketed sovereign wealth funds. An investment in Yahoo would also be extremely risky in the current advertising market and amid the company's ongoing search for a new chief executive. Sovereign investors have lost money on many large investments in the past year and may be reluctant to make a bet on a company with Yahoo's challenges.

It is unclear whether Microsoft Corp., which has indicated that it is still open to doing some sort of deal with Yahoo, would be involved in any transaction.

Mr. Miller has discussed the idea with some Yahoo board members, these people say, but the matter hasn't come up for an official board discussion.

The $20-$22 share offer is probably too high for Jon to be able to raise the financing.  There is a deal to be done here, though.  If Jon wants to take a run at the company, all he really needs to do is convince Carl Icahn, Gordy Crawford, Bill Miller, and a bunch of other Yahoo holders that he's the guy to run it.

*UPDATE: Some are suggesting that Jon Miller is just trying to raise a fund for Velocity and that the WSJ's Jessica Vascellaro got the story wrong.  Our guess is that the truth is somewhere in the middle: Jon is exploring the idea of raising money to buy Yahoo, which would be another way of saying he is "trying" to raise money to buy Yahoo. Either way, the money's not going to be easy to raise. Which is why we think getting himself appointed CEO and buying a bunch of the stock would be a cheaper and easier route.



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

17 Comments

Mulligan said:
A PE approach to running the company is warranted -- look at everything and cut (or invest) as appropriate. Until Jerry, Sue and many of the Yahoo old guard leave it will be impossible to really turn the ship around. Jon becomming CEO is not the same as Jon running a PE owned Yahoo. As CEO, he'll still have Jerry on the board and it will be harder to take the drastic action that is needed.
happyhappy said:
based on this it would appear that jon doesn't want to merely run the company. like everyone he realizes that the current board is full of boneheads and therefore wants to take control (and likely a much larger equity stake) with an entirely new team. allows him to get rid of jerry and filo entirely. big audacious move - hope it works...

and interesting that icahn buys a bunch of stock early last week and we have now had two different acquisition reports in the last four days...
Al said:
i heart capital markets
Yes, he'd have more control if he owned the whole thing. But at this point I think the Board and public shareholders would give him a huge amount of latitude. And Jerry would just be another shareholder...
happyhappy said:
@henry - i disagree - jerry and filo won't be just another couple of shareholders until they find new jobs or are stripped of their titles. don't underestimate the entrenched lifer culture that still exists @ y! - it gives these guys far more weight than their track records or ownership stakes warrant. the lifer crowd has to be purged entirely and that includes the chief yahoos...
Jessica Simpson said:
Yeah, Jon Miller approached me for cash but I said, "Uh Jon, AOL still sucks. Maybe it sucked a little less while you were running it but it still sucked and it continues to suck."
Nick Lachey said:
Jessica that is the most intelligent thing you have ever said.
JoeInsider said:
This assumes there are valuable underlying assets left at Yahoo. Display is going way of the dino's, media and search are fickle with zero consumer switching costs, and they don't really have anything else except inept management.
Dan said:
Gentleman, you obviously missed the memo. Yahoo is more alive than ever & here's the proof: http://startwearingpurple.yahoo.com/
hehateme said:
If anybody does buy yahoo. It will be Carl Ichan. He has been buying up shares like crazy.
anon said:
What % of shares do yang&filo own? If it is even 10% it would make getting a proxy vote won difficult.
So F'd said:
Yahoo is so f'd. They will continue becoming more and more irrelevant and will fade into history like all other examples of stupid and selfish management.
michael said:
Any guy who does yoga and the splits is a bit light in the loafers... good luck with that Yahoo!
geewhiz said:
He's not going to get the money for one simple reason: He has not been a successful CEO of an Internet company at any point in his career. As such, no smart investor is going to give him a fund to buy Yahoo, a most troubled asset. He didn't do a good job of positioning AOL for the future and his time at IAC was irrelevant.
Fake Ted Leonsis said:
Hey Jon, If you buy Yahoo can you hire me to be a likable do-nothing while you make all the tough decisions?
Chris said:
Doesn't he have a non-compete with TW that would preclude him from becoming CEO?
Vern said:
Dood has jell-o arms. Going a bit light on the cardio, huh Jon?

Join the discussion