T-Mobile Picks Yahoo For Mobile Portal, Ads (YHOO)

|

t-mobile-store.jpgT-Mobile is launching a new mobile portal powered by Yahoo (YHOO). The companies will share ad revenue, but aren't disclosing the length of the deal or whether Yahoo will offer the carrier guaranteed revenue.

Here's a backhanded compliment: T-Mobile told the WSJ that Yahoo is specifically best suited for its lower-end phones. If you recall, Google (GOOG) partnered with T-Mobile to launch its first phone, the geeky G1, last month.

This is a fine deal for Yahoo, but it makes the assumption that people will use the search engine they're forced upon, versus choosing the one they like the best.

Long term, we're not so sure about that. Right now, the user interface is terrible enough on most mobile Web browsers that we can see why people would use the search tool they're handed. But as phones keep getting better, we think people are smart enough to navigate to the search engine they prefer -- likely Google -- versus the one they're handed.

So far, this is mostly a theoretical market: Only about 7.7% of U.S. mobile subscribers use search on their phones, according to comScore M:Metrics. And as on the Web, Google is whipping its competition: 60% of mobile users use Google, compared with 36% for Yahoo. But we're not sure how many of those searches were done on default search tools versus search engines people picked themselves.

T-Mobile can use any boost it can get to attract more of its subscribers to the mobile Web. It lags its competitors by a long shot getting customers to pay for mobile data services, such as mobile Web access and text messaging. Last quarter, T-Mobile subscribers spent an average $8.90 per month on data service, compared to the $12-16 its larger rivals' customers spent monthly at AT&T (T), Verizon (VZ), and Sprint (S). One excuse: T-Mobile has lagged its rivals rolling out its fast, 3G network. Once that expands, it should attract more mobile Web traffic.

Verizon is close to signing a bigger deal with Microsoft (MSFT), which would bring in $550 million to $650 million in guaranteed revenue a year.

See Also:
Microsoft Close To Blowing Another $1 Billion On Verizon Search And Mobile Deal
Microsoft Tries To Steal Google's Verizon Mobile Search Deal
Steve Ballmer Pretends Not To Understand Google Android Pricing Strategy



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

10 Comments

Andrew Finkle (URL) said:
I have signed search engine deals in the past, and though I can not disclose specifics they are EXTREMELY lucrative. One only needs to look at Mozilla revenues from Google to see that.

My guess here regarding T-Mobile/Yahoo deal is that Yahoo gave away the ship (% of revenue) in a desperate act to lock up a carrier (note that T-Mobile is the smallest of the national carriers).

More notable is Yahoo's inability to lock up any major carrier deals.

Lastly, T-Mobile is the poster child for carriers being "Walled Gardens", and trying to force their users to use only the services they want. They did this to me when I had a Sidekick...which is why I am no longer a T-Mobile customer *(T-Mobile take notes)

www.twitter.com/A_F
Thanks, Andy. Assumed they're giving away huge share for the placement. I recall hearing something about T-Mobile trying to ditch that reputation and be 'opener' or something. But maybe I'm inventing that.
Paladin said:
Is it just me, or did the new updates to Windows Live mail just go South? My mouse freezes frequently when in hotmail (seem like there is background activity trying to load just one more annoying ad. The XP (rock solid?) crashed inside the mail once. No wonder T-Mobile signed with Yahoo. The ads integrate flawlessly no matter where one is traveling and they are not so invasive as to be obnoxious. At least it is not MSN as the portal, and heaven forbid, a T-Mobile portal. My guess is the quid pro quo is probably a free ride on ads for T-Mobile. The gateway is the little thing called scale in advertising. Since Yahoo has the most traffic and competes the least with T-Mobile, it's probably a reasonable choice. Bonne Chance!
noblow said:
Coming from a mobile application background, I have to say that Andy is 100% spot-on with his statement (I negotiated also a deal with one of the big wigs). Yahoo! probably earns very little from this. This is even more likely as Yahoo! is not exactly the best brand name to go with these days. The pain of this deal must have been sweetened by something. What might that be? Money.
Noblow, thanks, but not sure I understand. Who's sweetening the deal by paying whom?
noblow said:
T-Mobile may not like the Yahoo! brand. Not on their portal anyway. What might convince T-Mobile to do the deal anyway? Especially considering the recent trouble the Yahoo! brand has been going through? An extraordinary revenue share.
Ah, gotcha.
Popola said:
@Andrew Finkle

Yahoo actually has a deal with *the* biggest carrier- AT&T
boston739 said:
"T-Mobile is launching a new mobile portal powered by Yahoo (YHOO)."

"This is a fine deal for Yahoo, but it makes the assumption that people will use the search engine they're forced upon, versus choosing the one they like the best."

You make the assumption that the only thing people do online is search. Search consumes 5% of time spent online. Consuming content and communication consume the other 95%.

I would guess the new mobile portal powered by Yahoo has something other than search, like news, finance, sports, mail, flickr, etc. Just a guess.
Thanx You Very Much alley

lig tv izle

forum

Join the discussion