Microsoft: $20 Billion Of Cash Not Enough, So We're Borrowing More (MSFT)

|

ballmerfists.jpgMicrosoft (MSFT) filed documents with the SEC to issue bonds for the first time. CFO Chris Liddell paved the way for this after the Yahoo offer, which Microsoft planned to fund partly through debt. The difference between then and now, however, was that Microsoft had something in particular to spend the money on.

So why is it issuing bonds now, when it already has cash coming out of its ears? To make another pass at Yahoo? To buy Salesforce.com? Another company? 

To take advantage of a debt market starved for investments that are probably better credits than the United States government?

Or, most likely, to lever up and buy back a boatload of its own stock, which it considers deeply undervalued. (9X trailing earnings).

Bloomberg:

[Microsoft] is considering senior unsecured debt securities, according to a regulatory filing today with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. The shelf registration clears the way for the company to issue debt at any time.

A bond offering from Microsoft, which carries top credit ratings from Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service, would be in high demand, said Brad Lutz, vice president of investment research at Declaration Management & Research LLC, which manages about $16 billion in fixed-income assets. It helps that the company operates outside the realm of finance, he said.

“Non-financials have generally received a warm reception by the investment-grade capital markets,” Lutz said in an interview from his office in McLean, Virginia. “There’s certainly demand for higher-quality issuers.”

The open question: What is Microsoft planning to do with the cash?



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

21 Comments

hyloka said:
As a Microsoft shareholder, I vote for a repurchase. MS is severly undervalued.

Might also have the side benefit of helping provide more high quality debt for others to invest in. All of the titans of tech with hordes of cash would benefit from doing the same.

Henry, if Apple is so seriously undervalued why isn't Steve Job's using his cash horde to buy back shares?
rich b. said:
finally.

a company with brains. without getting fancy, their IRR is waaaaaay higher than dirt cheap borrowing costs right now.


this is a crisis of confidence and too much leverage.

but leverage works in the other direction.

you show 'em, microsoft.

If apple is so cheap, they should just buy them.
Jonathan Marcus (URL) said:
Preparing for its judgment day, in 2 - 3 PC cycles from now, when it finds itself in a similar position as the Big Three Autos. Vista & Office 2007 marked the monopoly franchise's death blow. Brilliant timing, however. Not unlike Berkshire Hathaway, Softie is leveraging its AAA rating as a core business model advantage.
Keeper said:
To repurchase some of the stock, the rest for buying Sun. By buying Sun they get the most scalable OS on the planet (they are in the process of slowly ditching Windows), loads of hardware designs and experts (perhaps for future XBox machines, perhaps for Azure servers), StarOffice, MySQL and Java. And they could do it, too. Perhaps they desperately need to - it would pretty much be a guaranteed downfall for them if Apple bought Sun.

In case Apple bought Sun, Apple would seriously enter high-end server space, merge Solaris and Mac OS X (nightmare for MS), use hardware engineers for iPod/iPhone/Macs/Servers and transform AppleTV into some kind of full-blown home system (movie/music/photo storage, gaming, etc, etc). Apple could even buy AMD+ATI too. They get supply of x86 CPUs, graphics chips, chipsets, storage systems - and Sun already ships x86-64 stuff. Let's remember, Apple is primarily a hardware shop with killer software to boot.

With one smart purchase MS could end all that. Of course, SGI (also, loads of server/visualisation/workstation stuff, XFS... ) isn't all that financially stable either...

With so many hi-tech companies wobbling around, MS with their cash and bonds could get IBM big in no time at all.
Marah Marie (URL) said:
@jd: That would be....interesting. Sorry, but I'm still trying to wrap my head around the idea of Microsoft running Yahoo! or AOL - or both - thinking of them running Apple just hurts my brain.
Robleh (URL) said:
Some buyback, some acquisition spree - Facebook is first.
Jonathan Marcus (URL) said:
Aside from stock purchases, Keeper's position makes a good deal of sense. However, actually integrating companies of that size is not as simple as a blog post. Henry seems to make the same strategic oversimplification too, and quite often. M&A aint easy.
wingthom (URL) said:
They will look after SAP, my guess. SAP is heavily undervalued right now. Merge SAP & Office products, bring it to the web (business by design / office online) and there is no need for Salesforce / Google Apps etc. any longer.
Microsoft had over $40B in cash in the late 90's. Instead of using that huge leverage wisely, it paid out dividends in order to make MSFT look more attractive.

Today, MSFT does not have a boatload of anything except a dying OS that is Windows Mobile, a desktop OS that is looking a bit worse for wear, a future desktop OS that is looking like the walking dead, and an office suite that does quite well.

OTOH, Apple has $7B more than MSFT in the bank, growing market share at the expense of MSFT in the desktop, laptop, mobile, and entertainment markets.

So how does MSFT respond to this successful multi-front threat by Apple? By innovating? No. By going further into debt...when
Apple owes $0. Bravo, Mr. Ballmer!
Andrew S said:
Microsoft needs an internet strategy that works. Their current strategy has stuck MSFT at a ten-year low. The cheapest, fastest way to go big into it is buying Yahoo. They'll instantly gain a billion web users and 20% search market share. The search-only deal offers neither company anything except maybe a couple dollars boost in stock price.

Stock buybacks (the sort unrelated to employee compensation) are a bit of a scam and I always sell immediately after the buyback.

Why aren't Microsoft shareholders more angry?
Jgbr said:
I think Sun will be bailed out by Google and not Microsoft.
r-ness said:
ms will almost certainly emerge from this recession stronger in a relative sense. a consumer-led recession will hurt apple/google much more than ms - check relative stock declines. bottom line is that nothing is legitimately threatening ms core businesses in a near-term (5 years) way.
Auguste Rodin said:
a mature company can and should take advantage of a mature cap structure.

buying apple is a stupid idea. wouldnt be allowed.
buying sun, sgi, sap are all stupid ideas. supprised you haven't suggested they buy cisco - which makes as much sense as these other suggestions.
(Apple buying sun is equally stupid. Apple, rightly, wants nothing to do with enterprise.)
MSFT buying yahoo is also stupid. just partner on the search for $2bn instead of buying whole company for $15bn.

But, MSFT buying salesforce or similar is a great idea.
buying other true enterprise Saas plays (email archiving, erp, etc) are also great ideas. transformational, and inline with stated (correct) strategy.
It is all about the cloud from here on out.

now get back to your day trading and leave the thinking to those who can do it without hurthing themselves.




Migukin (URL) said:
If Microsoft buys any company now, it probably will be Facebook. Facebook would fit nicely with M$'s over all plans. I can't really see Sun allowing itself to be bought by M$ since they like hate each other so much.

And, yes, it would be Google, if anyone, who bought Sun.

Apple I don't really see buying anyone. I suspect their corp. culture is so unique that any large buy would be a deadend.

Now, if Facebook bought eBay or AOL...then they might be cooking with gas. Facebook has the audience and the useage, but they don't really seem to understand the crux of their power -- the value added stuff that people would use it for (i.e. buying something their friend had put on eBay.)

AOL would provide them with a huge number of accounts to convert into Facebook accounts and the social graph benefits would probably be pretty sweet. And, I would use Facebook for email if I had the option.
JoeInsider said:
Go hostile for Apple?
Mike @ WannaDevelop.com (URL) said:
Facebook to buy anybody?? Have they even figured out how to make money with their own operation?? Too funny ;)

Mike --- http://www.wannadevelop.com
Chris said:
Apple might just buy TWX, the way this market is looking. They'll probably have cash left over.
Chris said:
Now, if Facebook bought eBay or AOL...then they might be cooking with gas

What, with all ~$50m they have left in cash?

and the social graph benefits would probably be pretty sweet.

And is this "social graph" thing just some sort of a "web 2.0" conference injoke? I did a fair bit of graduate CS including a fair bit of graph theory and I have no flipping idea what you kids are talking about.
Thanx You Very Much alley

lig tv izle

forum

Join the discussion