Why Apple Won't Get Crushed By The Recession

|

stevejobs.jpgApple's stock has been cut in half this year as investors worry sick that, as the recession takes hold, consumers and companies won't be able to afford its slick, expensive products anymore. Many analysts have also noted that most of the growth in the laptop market is at the super-low-price end, and that Apple still doesn't play there. The lack of the announcement of an $800 laptop last week further fueled these fears.

Fear not!

Apple is handling these latest challenges the right way. It is a premium brand with premium products and premium profit margins, and it would be a terrible mistake for the company to suddenly begin to compete on price. (Or, worse, to throw its whole value proposition out the window because of a temporary dip in the economy.)

People buy Apple products because of the magical halo of quality and cool that Steve "Sex in a Box" Jobs endows them with, and they understand and accept that--to get that halo--you have to pay up. Once Apple's marketing pitch becomes "costs the same as a Dell", this sexiness will evaporate, and the company will become just another box maker.

It is true that it will be more and more challenging for Apple to maintain its amazing growth and margins as it moves out of a small, passionate high-end market and into the mass market, but the company is gradually positioning itself to do this without sacrificing its premium positioning. Importantly, its prices are coming down, just not enough to where anyone will accuse it of trying to compete on price.

  • A $1,000 laptop is not really much more expensive than an $800 laptop, especially for a product that should last a few years. Apple will never win over the folks who choose purely on price anyway, so it would be dumb for it to sacrifice its premium positioning to try.
  • The $200 iPhone has much of the functionality that many people once looked to laptops for, and some potential buyers of $500-$800 laptop will opt for that instead. Apple's iPhone, moreover, is still the highest quality product in the market, so no one who buys it will ever feel like they're settling for less.

In short, Apple has positioned itself to sell products to all but the most price-sensitive segment of the market. and because that segment is also the least profitable (except at Walmart-like scale), the company is smart not to sacrifice its brand and value proposition to play there.

But Won't a Recession Flatten The Company?

No.  BMW, Mercedes, and--more relevantly--Toyota don't go out of business every time the economy weakens. They get hit, of course--everyone gets hit--but their value proposition doesn't suddenly disappear.

What will likely happen to Apple over the next 18 months?

  • Its growth will be slower than expected (because some customers will either delay purchases or choose cheaper options).
  • Its margins will be lower (because it will be spreading its fixed costs over a smaller sales base)

The stock market has already foreseen this, which is why the stock has gotten so beaten up.  There is a big difference between this and Apple being in any sort of trouble, however. And that's why you've also seen such aggressive buying every time the stock gets near $90 a share.

Apple has $20+ billion in cash, no debt, and the highest margins and fastest growth rate in the industry. At $90, after excluding the value of the cash, the stock trades at just under 10X free cash flow, which is an extraordinarily low multiple for a company of this quality. In a market environment like this, the stock could obviously go lower, but if it does, this won't be because of any mistakes Apple has made.

See Also:
Apple Fans Predict Blowout Quarter--But All That Matters Is Guidance
Apple Stock: Why Major Buyers Are Stepping In At $90



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

33 Comments

Insider Trader said:
More interesting is Apple wanting to arbitrate in secret with Psystar. Wonder if this is all a move by Apple to pay Psystar a nice chunk of change to go out of business. Last thing Apple wants is some company exposing Apple's monopolistic ways in court.
pumper said:
AAPL == BMW/Benz?

huh? that is so wrong... AAPL isn't anyway near BMW/Benz's status. name one quality of aapl products that is so unique & vitally important that the only place you can get is from aapl products. none! the truth is aapl is just an artsy computer assembler. they don't handmade super nice cpu; they don't manufacture the uni-body case and make it exclusive; leopard isn't the most rock solid OS. so, because of the lack of these "fundamental" skills, copycats of aapl products can usually hit the market within 6-12 mos, sometimes even sooner. the time span any aapl product remains unique & superior is less than 6-12 mos while on the other hand, BMW/Benz produces cars that simply drive & handle even better than cars produced 5-10 years to come from GM/Ford.

aapl simply doesn't have that engineering depth to leave its competitors eating the dust for a full product cycle. and don't forget, ipod is ipod simply because of accidental monopoly caused by narrow minded music industry that can't embrace DRM-free world. it's safe to say, there is no aapl today if it weren't for DRM.
dirk said:
"People buy Apple products because of the magical halo of quality and cool . . . "

That is one shaky, long-term value proposition. You cannot be everywhere and also "magically" cool.
Dean Wermer said:
Anecdotal: I know a handful of people who had held off buying a macbook pro this year waiting for the latest update. Now that the update is shipping, they (except for one with a very old powerbook) have decided, at least for the moment, not to purchase - solely because of price. None of these potential buyers are poor, though none are rich. I believe all own multiple Apple products, iphones, ipods, powerbooks, macbooks, etc. I find it hard to believe (i) these potential buyers are unique, and (ii) there won't be a price cut in the near future in order to shake loose the wallets of potential purchasers such as these.
Yes...Benz and BMW are bad analogies. Toyota's a better one. High quality, premium (but not outrageous) price.
Martin (URL) said:
Toyota??? Is it really perceived as a premium brand in the US? In Europe it has the cheap and copycat image as every other asian car company.

So comparing Apple with Toyota is an insult in my opinion (although I am not even an Apple fan), whereas it works comparing with Mercedes and BMW.
Ken G. said:
What about the contra-argument that AAPL will suffer from the maturation of the iPod, highly competitive handset market with new viable alternatives (new Blackberry, Instinct, etc.), and lower demand for postpaid AT&T contracts in a tougher economy?

Also, the new iPod Touch is a viable choice for those wanting the iPhone but without the phone contract.

A slowdown could become more severe for any consumer electronics maker in a doozy of a recession. And strip away all the glitz and glamour......Apple is just, at its core, a consumer electronics maker.

Seems to me $70 to $80 could happen sooner or later.
Kontra (URL) said:
"copycats of aapl products can usually hit the market within 6-12 mos..."

A decade after the introduction of the one-piece iMac, half a decade after the iTunes/iPod and two years after the iPhone, the rest of the industry still doesn't have products equaling their overall value and appeal.
Melangell said:
From Pumper:

"AAPL isn't anyway near BMW/Benz's status. name one quality of aapl products that is so unique & vitally important that the only place you can get is from aapl products. "

Well, what unique and vitally important thing would a Beemer or Benz give me? I can get in my 2000 Suzuki Vitara and ride down the road as I could in a B or B. I can listen to the radio in my Vitara as I could in a B or B. What unique and vitally important thing would buying a B or B give me? The comparison of Apple to BMW and Mercedes is very apt.
KenC said:
One, Henry did you decide to write this article because the NYTs wrote theirs?

Two, @Insider, you assume Apple "wanted" to arbitrate. No one knows who asked for arbitration.

Back to Henry, you assume "everyone gets hit", but that's not necessarily true. You forgot the "flight to quality" argument? If the value proposition of Apple's line has gotten better, which it has, why can't it continue stealing share from the other PC makers, even if the overall market is stagnating? Isn't that what it has been doing? Why can't that continue? According to NPD's latest stats, the US market grew 4.6%, but Apple made up 2.6% of that, leaving about 2% growth for the rest of the market. As long as it continues to do that, it can outperform its way thru the recession.

Henry, you say investors are worried sick about the economic slowdown, but virtually every other company has already shown evidence of a slowdown, except Apple, and yet Apple has been hammered more than your average CE or PC or tech retailer. What's up with that? People don't expect this quarter's earnings to reflect any slowdown, and they think 4th calendar quarter guidance will prove them justified, but we all know that Apple guides conservatively. The fact is Apple has always guided conservatively, and yet blows guidance out of the water. You'd think markets would make an adjustment for that by now, and yet they don't.
dj said:
Well i like your 10x fcf better then 15x you gave googie(6 to 9 cf going forward). last report i saw on cash 12B, but 20plus , hope it's not locked up in STP,CDO,or some other abcp crap
crawford said:
I love it when a plan comes together. This one has been about 30 yrs in the making. At times it baffles me that some folks still don't see it.
Partners in Grime (URL) said:
Placed an order for a 2.8GHz MacBook Pro with 4GB RAM Tuesday evening. Waited for the new model announcement and couldn't be happier.
s1do (URL) said:
Lógicamente las empresas grandes y previsoras no tienen de que preocuparse, sus ingresos no serán tan elevados y no crecerán tan rápido como lo estaban haciendo pero lo que está claro es que no perderán dinero, simplemente dejarán de ganar tanto.

De todas formas, el hardware de Apple me parece muy caro, posiblemente por eso tienen un margen de beneficios muy alto y la caída de las ventas no les preocupe en exceso.
NickyC said:
None of this explains why the new Macbook Pros are £1400 and £1800 in the UK. Not at all. Isn't that around $3000! For a laptop computer! I think it would serve Apple right to get a big kick in the pocket. Sometimes, enough is enough. Nothing in this world is THAT cool. And buying a computer that expensive just to try and look cool makes you a dork!
chano said:
@ no_u
Man, I can see that your posts are really an angstful description of your life. You must stay of the tablets and let your story unfold.
Other than that, your work may qualify as art. I was looking for some cool wallpaper. Now I've found it. Thanks. I'd call it angst infinitum.
btw: Apple can take one simple step, using a recent corporate acquisition, to make any PsyStar (or similar encroacher wannabe) irrelevant and obsolete. 10c will get you the how.
Keep posting no_u. Relieve our boredom whydontcha?
shenmue said:
@Pumper said:

- they don't handmade super nice cpu

Yes, but they will...PA-SEMI

- they don't manufacture the uni-body case and make it exclusive

False...

- leopard isn't the most rock solid OS

False, and Leo is by far the most ergonomic OS

So... for 1300 dollars you have

- A finition upper class (Unibody)
- A beautiful LED screnn
- A multitouch Trackpad...

There's no competitor in this price range
Jiff Reilly said:
We jsut bought 3 IPhones and while we were at teh AT&T store, many people were buying them.

Jiff
www.privacy-center.be.tc
free contract mobiles (URL) said:
Even after a decade since the introduction of the iMac, half a decade after the iTunes/iPod and two years after the iPhone, the rest of the industry still doesn't have products equaling Apple's overall value and appeal.

Apple is definitely ahead of the rest
Jeremy (URL) said:
The article, the pricipitating comments... All spoken like true Die-Hard MAC fans. Get over yourself, please? "Mac is the cremme de le cremme" blah blah blah. I can run OSX on any piece of equipment, MAC or not, from the last 5 years. I have a Pentium 4 box that runs OSX 10.5.1 faster than the Intel Core 2 Duo iMacs.

I hope apple eventually goes under, just so all of you die-hards will STFU.
Hasani said:
@Jeremy


"I have a Pentium 4 box that runs OSX 10.5.1 faster than the Intel Core 2 Duo iMacs. "

I'm sorry , but I just have to call bullshit on that one. or did you just run the iMac with 1GB of ram?
chano said:
@Jeremy
Come on now. Confess. You don't even have the money to buy a used photo of a 10 year old peee C. I sympathise with your poverty but really you are clearly hallucinating on all this wishful hyperventilating you're doing. Give it up. There is life beyond having all the things we can't afford. How about joining a Monastery and .......
jsfabb said:
I am not a big Apple fan, but I do own some of their stock. I don't own any of their products, but the people I talk to seem to love them.

One thing I did notice when I went to the mall with my wife this past weekend was that the Apple Store was jammed. What the sell rate was of the people who entered the store, I have no clue. Also, what the affect the new products had on the traffic to the store was, I don't have a clue either. But, the volume was certainly there and the store personnel were busy demonstrating all sorts of products. I have a feeling that when Apple reports earnings they will be pretty good.

Just my take!
smartone said:
When Macbooks first came out they had a similar value proposition to windows laptop with the same features.

but two years later you can get much more PC laptop for much less than a macbook

in addition PC laptop used to have a floor price - but with Netbooks that floor is disappearing

the question what do people do with laptops?
going on web
word processing

do you spend 1300 bucks on a Macbook or 550 bucks on a MSI Wind?

it will be hard for apple to compete in the laptop market going forward.
Adam said:
@Jeremy
You know it's illegal to run OSX on non-Mac hardware, right? It's in the Terms of Use for the OS. One more way Apple squeezes it's iron fist around everything it does.
Chuck said:
A $200 phone? LOL

I just got a 16GB iPhone. Thank god I didn't have to pay for it (I won it in a bet). It was $600+ out the door (I had an existing service plan with ATT).

There's no way in HELL I would have paid that much for a phone. I even cringed when I had to pony up $150 for my Tilt.
BrettSF said:
I have been saying this for weeks. Apple is following the same strategy that Harley Davidson (of all companies) did, believe it or not. Rather than cut prices to increase their market share, they would rather sell fewer quantities in the short term and maintain their long term position as a superior good.

It's all about long term strategy, and Apple can afford to focus on the long term given the number that you can read in this article.

Disclaimer: I own AAPL stock and just switched to Mac for the first time this weekend (one of the new Macbooks).
Joe Seefus said:
A recession usually does not crush a company that sells items with moderate to high profit margins such as Apple. It usually puts downward pressure on demand for it's products that turns into, as you stated in your article, lower margins and lower growth. As for competing on price, Apple has and will never do that. They lost the business desktop market in the late eights to the early ninties when a Macintosh was retailing for $5,000 but an IBM PC was going for $2,500. Businesses went for the cheaper IBM PC and Jobs is known to have been "confused" why businesses didn't buy the better Macintosh. Jobs is a great showman but I sometimes wonder about his business decisions. Apple also allowed Mac clones to be manufactured and sold in the late nineties in a failed attempt to get more of the desktop market. This failed because businesses and consumers bought the Mac clones because they were priced lower than the real Macs sold by Apple. As long as Steve Jobs is running Apple they will continue to price their products higher then everyone else. Remember, they now have store leases and store labor to pay for along with the folks in Cupertino. Whether this is a good business decision or not remains to be seen.

A few other points:

- "A $1,000 laptop is not really much more expensive than an $800 laptop, especially for a product that should last a few years. Apple will never win over the folks who choose purely on price anyway, so it would be dumb for it to sacrifice its premium positioning to try."

Not really much more expensive? I believe that would depend on the individual consumer. If one does not have the money then they are unable to purchase said item, regardless of the amount that they are short. Actually Apple would sell more units if they lowered their price but they need the profit margin.

- Your statement about the "$200 iPhone" is completely erroneous. The initial purchase of an iPhone is around $200 but one is required purchase a two year contract with AT&T. I believe that total cost would be around $2,300 or so (one's mileage may vary).

- And yes, Apple stock could go down because of Apple making yet another mistake.
Intosh said:
Lots of words that tell us really nothing. Sure this ~100B$ company will not simply cease to exist due to a recession, just like the HPs, MS', IBMs, Dells, Oracles, Adobes won't. Is it a slow day today?
duke1247 (URL) said:
I don't know if this is the perfect solution but I recently bought a used Apple Powerbook for a great price. What a great machine and what a great buy. It came with every bit of software I needed except Quicken. Mac OSX is without a doubt "THE BEST". What I really like is the fact that I don't have to buy malware software every year, spyware software every year, virus software every year and best of all, unless I want to, I'm not using that gawd awful Windows OS. I might even buy some Apple stock.
Dean said:
I think you underestimate the repercussions of what has happened and is still going to happen to the economy. You wouldn't happen to own Apple shares would you? Your comments are completely rediculous.

BMW is a premium car marker, yet they still have cars that cater for the lower end market, so does Mercedes as do most intelligent premium companies. It's about diversification. Diversify or die.
DVD burner for Mac provides an easy and fast way to convert popular video formats (including AVI, MPEG, WMV, DivX, XviD, MP4, DV, VOB, ASF, 3GP, NUT, YUV, H.264/AVC, M4V files to DVD. The DVD Burner Mac could also burn DVD movie onto DVD disk that playable on portable or home DVD player and burn DVD folder or ISO files. No other Mac DVD burner can provide so many formats.
DivX to DVD Converter for Mac can not only convert DivX to DVD Mac, but also support convert AVI to DVD, 3GP to DVD, MP4 to DVD, FLV to DVD, MPEG to DVD, WMV to DVD, etc.
The DivX to DVD Converter Mac developed only for Mac OS (include Mac OS X 10.5 leopard) burning users.
The DivX to DVD converter for Mac can convert all formats like MP4, M4V, MPA, MPG, MPEG, MOV,3GP, 3GP2, FLV, MOV,VOB, DAT, TS, TP, TRP, M2TS, DivX, DivX to DVD on Mac OS.
AVI to DVD for Mac, a profeesional but easy-to-use DVD burn software for Mac users, can convert AVI to DVD format on Mac OS X perfectly and quickly. The AVI to DVD Mac not only supports converting AVI to DVD Mac but also supports other popular formats to DVD on Mac, such as MPA, ASF, DIF, H261, YUV, NUT and so on.
With the AVI to DVD Mac, you can easily convert and burn AVI files to your DVD and play it on portable or home DVD player.

Join the discussion