The Sexiest Business in the World

|

plentyoffish.jpg
The sexiest business in the world is not the music business, despite EMI's $400,000 coke and hookers budget. It's not Google or Goldman Sachs, though those are probably No. 2 and No. 3. It might be Craigslist, but Craigslist doesn't publish its bottom line. (By the way, here's why Craigslist sucks)

In business, sexy = productive, so the sexiest business in the world would seem to be dating site Plenty of Fish.

The key stats? Per today's New York Times update, two employees, one of which claims to only work 10 hours a week, and $10 million in profit. That's a $5 million contribution per employee to the bottom line.

(There are plenty of service businesses in which key rainmakers pull in more than this, but they usually have a big support staff. Okay, screw it, there are no doubt hedge funds where the per-employee contribution is probably in the $100s of millions. So let's limit the superlative to "Sexiest Internet Business").

Plenty of Fish's secrets to success?
  • Free site in a business dominated by subscription sites
  • User-generated content (personals)
  • User-generated editing (users scan 50,000 photos a day to eliminate nudity, bestiality, etc.)
  • Almost no attention to design or other expensive but largely irrelevant details (founder Marcus Frind deems such things "trivial" details that don't bother users)
  • Purge 30% of users per month for being inactive (this is critical: other free dating sites--and even some subscription sites--suffer because they are littered with garbage listings)
  • Delete spam and scams (also critical)
Put all that together, and you get 600,000 registered users and 1.2 billion pageviews in December (and a 20% increase above that in the two weeks since).

See Also: The World's Most Productive Business: Plenty of Fish



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

5 Comments



UserName said:

Niki Scevak said:
Perhaps another way to look at it is passive vs active businesses.

So hedge funds obviously require you to be active (making investment decisions) whereas if Markus walked away for a month, the site wouldn't be effected that much.

Paul Wallbank said:
Is this business really that sexy? The NYT article refers to at least 120 unpaid volunteers editing out the dross.

Add those volunteers to the numbers and you're down to just over 80k per worker. Not shabby, but not spectacular either.

The fact Markus is getting 100% commissions on some referrals illustrates we're at the top of the online advertising market.

If Henry's right in this posts about a looming advertising recession, it's going to be very interesting watching how One More Fish and similar sites adapt and survive.

Join the discussion