Radiohead: 1.3 Mil Downloads! (But Big Music Not Dead)
Reports are trickling in on the initial results of Radiohead's pay-what-you-like-for-our-music experiment: We hear the current totals are 1.3 million downloads since "In Rainbows" went on "sale" Wednesday.
So what does that mean for the band and the industry?
For Radiohead, the gambit is an unqualified success: While true cheapskates could take the songs for free, anyone willing to pay at least a penny also ended up paying a 45 pence (91 cents U.S.) processing charge, so band will certainly cover costs, and is quite likely to make a significant profit (Two of our sources immediately ordered the $80 box set). The band will also sell old-fashioned CDs next year, and while demand for those will be much less now that most Radiohead fans already own the music, the band can still pocket some extra change from that. Most important: The band, who already does a great concert business, has received an incalculable amount of goodwill and free publicity for their next tour.
Contrary to the buzz of the last few weeks, however, this does not represent the end of the conventional music labels. The big music labels are in trouble, but not because Radiohead is giving its music away -- they're in trouble because they can't sell CDs by artists who want to sell them.
The "give away your music, make it up on tour and merchandise" model only works for outliers in the music business. It works for bands with little or no profile, who aren't giving up music sales to begin with. It also works for big, aging acts that have sold plenty of records in the past, but fewer in recent years. Pollstar's list of top touring acts of 2006, for instance, was dominated by oldies whose CD-selling days are long behind them: The Rolling Stones, Barbara Streisand, Elton John, etc. Meanwhile, don't forget that, to get to this stage, Radiohead received plenty of support -- and money -- from its former label EMI.
New York Times columnist Rob Walker sums it up nicely on his murketing blog:
I think it’s a big mistake to draw conclusions about the Death of Big Labels based on the successes (or failures) of bands that built massive followings while on a big label. Radiohead isn’t coming out of nowhere: According the RIAA site, Pablo Honey, The Bends, OK Computer, and Kid A are all platinum records. So Yorke can breezily dismiss the need for labels now, but that’s after a decade-plus of benefiting from having the big-label machine work his records at radio, bankroll the early videos and tours when they weren’t megastars, etc. I’m not saying the old model isn’t under serious pressure; I’m saying that you can’t make sweeping conclusions without considering residual effect from the old model.
Follow-up: How Much Did Radiohead Make? It Doesn't Matter
Related: Radiohead's Old/New Business Model: Free Music, Universal's Subscription Plan: Too Little, Too Late?, Bye-Bye Madonna: Warner Music Dodges A Bullet




Warhammer powerleveling
wow power leveling
Warhammer powerleveling
Warhammer powerlevel
Warhammer Gold
Aion powerleveling
Aion Gold
货架货架厂白癜风白癜风治疗白癜风资讯毛刷毛刷厂工业毛刷清洗毛刷
MyTechSis Otomobil Ödüllü Seo Yarışması
MyTechSis Otomobil Ödüllü Seo Yarışması
sohbet
sohbet
sohbet
chat
msn
kimsesiz
belediye baskanlari
belediye baskanlari
belediye baskanlarimiz
belediye baskanlarimiz
belediye baskanlarimiz
belediye baskanlarimiz
belediye baskanlarimiz
belediye baskanlarimiz
erotik resimler
senato adayları
millet vekili adaylari
belediye baskanları
komik fikralar
manzara resimleri
tente
Apple News
Asia Travel
Body jewelry
Eat near you
gift shop
learn chinese
MMORPG News
Mobile News
Nintendo DS
Pc Gaming
PlayStation 3 News
PSP news
Web Design
Wii News
wow gold
WOW GOLD
wow gold de
wow gold fr
Xbox 360
iPod Mac, iPod to Mac Transfer, DVD to iPod converter for Mac, iPod Video Converter for Mac
Video Converter for Mac - 3GP Converter for Mac - AVI Converter for Mac - DAT Converter for Mac - FLV Converter for Mac - M4V Converter for Mac - MOV Converter for Mac - MP4 Converter for Mac - MPEG Converter for Mac - VOB Converter for Mac - iPod Converter for Mac
DVD Creator for Mac - DVD Burner for Mac - AVI to DVD for Mac - DivX to DVD Converter Mac
FLV Converter Mac - FLV to AVI for Mac - FLV to iPod for Mac - FLV to MP4 for Mac - FLV to iPhone for Mac - FLV to Apple TV Mac - FLV to PSP for Mac - FLV to PS3 for Mac - FLV to M4V for Mac - FLV to MOV for Mac - FLV to 3GP for Mac - FLV to ASF for Mac - FLV to MPEG for Mac - FLV to M4A for Mac - FLV to AAC for Mac - FLV to MP3 for Mac
清中表现为大三阳,因此大三阳也反映了机体中病毒在不断复制繁殖,而届时肝脏的损害通常较轻,有相当一部分被感染者,尤其是女性被感
染者,病毒可长期或终身和机体“和平共处”,如此我们称为“病毒携带者”,即机体长期携带了乙肝病毒,而肝脏损害较轻,可以生活到60
-70岁以上,没有明显症状,并不一定因肝脏疾病病故,他们主要起着传染源的作用。
脂肪肝是指由于各种原因引起的肝细胞内脂肪堆积过多的病变。脂肪性肝病正严重威胁国人
的健康,成为仅次于病毒性肝炎的第二大肝病,已被公认为隐蔽性肝硬化的常见原因。脂肪肝是一种常见的临床现象,而非一种独立的疾病。
其临床表现轻者无症状,重者病情凶猛。一般而言,脂肪肝属可逆性疾病,早期诊断并及时治疗常可恢复正常。正常人的肝内总脂量,约占肝
重的5%,内含磷脂、甘油三酯、脂酸、胆固醇及胆固醇脂。而患脂肪肝者,总脂量可达40%-50%,主要是甘油三酯及脂酸,而磷脂、胆固醇及胆
固醇脂只少量增加。
乙肝乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)引起的一种世界性疾病。发展中国家发病率高,据统计,全世界无症状乙
肝病毒携带者(HBsAg携带者)超过2.8亿,我国约占9300万。多数无症状,其中1/3出现肝损害的临床表现。目前我国有乙肝患者3000万。乙肝的
特点为起病较缓,以亚临床型及慢性型较常见。无黄疸型HBsAg持续阳性者易慢性化。本病主要通过血液、母婴和性接触进行传播。乙肝疫苗的
应用是预防和控制乙型肝炎的根本措施。
治疗乙肝
大三阳即是两对半检查中,表面抗原(HBsAg)、e抗原(HBeAg)和抗核杭体(HBcAb)为阳
性。幼儿感染乙肝病毒的前数年至十余年间,病毒和机体“和平共处”,血清中表现为大三阳,因此大三阳也反映了机体中病毒在不断复制繁殖,
而届时肝脏的损
乙肝小三阳
治疗脂肪肝
小三阳的治疗
dvd creator for mac
dvd ripper for mac
dvd to ipod converter for mac
flv to ipod mac
iphone converter for mac
ipod to mac transfer
mac avi converter
mp4 converter for mac
mod converter
avi to swf
Nevertheless, I can definitely see myself purchasing the CD when it becomes available.
Any mobile payment companies listening
Both statements are quite incorrect.
Google is NOT the only company making "big" money in the "digital space". See: eBay (profitable from Day 1), Amazon, Yahoo. Here's a Top 6 from Fortune: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/industries/Internet_Services_and_Retailing/1.html
Finally, iTunes makes quite a bit of money from music. It is a myth that they use it to sell iPods (but it is certainly quite useful, no doubt). See: http://daringfireball.net/2007/09/more_amazon_mp3_store
at info@ladykier.com
Enjoy the music.
Check out the Ad-Supported Music Central blog:
http://ad-supported-music.blogspot.com/
Here are two problems common to both. It becomes impossible to "promote". Although they'll have some kind of royalty structure, inevitably there will be a leveling of the stars with the serfs. How do you get kids to listen to the new Usher single on their PC or MP3 player? They've already paid what they're going to pay. Who will care? Good for me as the stuff I dislike (50cent, Nickelback) will be penalized in favor of the stuff I like (Marshall Crenshaw, Tom Verlaine.) But promotion is one of the two raison d'etre's of the labels. They can't run the ship on Aphex Twin and Roy Hargrove.
The other problem with these models is that they both preserve the "song" as the basic product of the recorded music business. The 3-5Mb MP3 just doesn't have that much economic value as a stand-alone product. (Madonna has recognized that and is redefining her core product as the concert.) But there are larger, lumpier, harder -to-file-share products the music industry can create -- digital ones at that. But they don't fit well with the super subscription or tax models.
And one more thing. It is very difficult to make big money in the digital space except for Google of course. Remember iTunes sells iPods not downloads.