Radiohead: 1.3 Mil Downloads! (But Big Music Not Dead)

|

Reports are trickling in on the initial results of Radiohead's pay-what-you-like-for-our-music experiment: We hear the current totals are 1.3 million downloads since "In Rainbows" went on "sale" Wednesday.

So what does that mean for the band and the industry?

For Radiohead, the gambit is an unqualified success: While true cheapskates could take the songs for free, anyone willing to pay at least a penny also ended up paying a 45 pence (91 cents U.S.) processing charge, so band will certainly cover costs, and is quite likely to make a significant profit (Two of our sources immediately ordered the $80 box set). The band will also sell old-fashioned CDs next year, and while demand for those will be much less now that most Radiohead fans already own the music, the band can still pocket some extra change from that. Most important: The band, who already does a great concert business, has received an incalculable amount of goodwill and free publicity for their next tour.

Contrary to the buzz of the last few weeks, however, this does not represent the end of the conventional music labels. The big music labels are in trouble, but not because Radiohead is giving its music away -- they're in trouble because they can't sell CDs by artists who want to sell them.

The "give away your music, make it up on tour and merchandise" model only works for outliers in the music business. It works for bands with little or no profile, who aren't giving up music sales to begin with. It also works for big, aging acts that have sold plenty of records in the past, but fewer in recent years. Pollstar's list of top touring acts of 2006, for instance, was dominated by oldies whose CD-selling days are long behind them: The Rolling Stones, Barbara Streisand, Elton John, etc. Meanwhile, don't forget that, to get to this stage, Radiohead received plenty of support -- and money -- from its former label EMI.

New York Times columnist Rob Walker sums it up nicely on his murketing blog:

I think it’s a big mistake to draw conclusions about the Death of Big Labels based on the successes (or failures) of bands that built massive followings while on a big label. Radiohead isn’t coming out of nowhere: According the RIAA site, Pablo Honey, The Bends, OK Computer, and Kid A are all platinum records. So Yorke can breezily dismiss the need for labels now, but that’s after a decade-plus of benefiting from having the big-label machine work his records at radio, bankroll the early videos and tours when they weren’t megastars, etc. I’m not saying the old model isn’t under serious pressure; I’m saying that you can’t make sweeping conclusions without considering residual effect from the old model.

Follow-up: How Much Did Radiohead Make? It Doesn't Matter

Related: Radiohead's Old/New Business Model: Free Music, Universal's Subscription Plan: Too Little, Too Late?, Bye-Bye Madonna: Warner Music Dodges A Bullet



< Prev. Story
Next Story >

28 Comments

geciktiricial (URL) said:
wenhalin (URL) said:
The government should arrest all of them and kill them all, you American have killed many people, don’t forget you have erased nations from the face of the earth, you killed all the Native Indians,
货架货架厂白癜风白癜风治疗白癜风资讯毛刷毛刷厂工业毛刷清洗毛刷
bigwave said:
How to download YouTube videos for mac and convert the .FLV files on Mac OS? Here are the easy-to-use and top-user-rating YouTube Video Grabber Mac and Mac FLV converter tools. It is safe to install and no spyware or adware guarenteed.
boxer said:
How to download and convert the FLV files on Mac OS? Here are the easy-to-use and top-user-rating Free YouTube Downloader for Mac and FLV converter tools. It is safe to install and there are no spyware or adware.
cage nick said:
With the YouTube Converter for Mac application, you can easily download youtube for mac and convert YouTube videos on your Mac OS.
justice said:
I suggest 2 FLV Converter for Mac software. One is powerful in download YouTube Videos and convert downloaded FLV files; the other is professional in video converting, which can not only convert .flv video to all media formats, but also can convert all kinds of video formats to .flv, plus popular videos.

sohbet chat sohbet chat çet sohbet chat özcan sarıca ile kurtlar vadisi pusu 3.sezon 1.seo yarışması aytug akdogan ödüllü 1. seo yarışması ve yurtta barış dünyada barış sesli chat sesli sohbet sesli görüntülü chat görüntülü sohbet kameralı sohbet kameralı chat bayan arkadaş görüntülü çet sesli muhabbet kızlarla sohbet kızlarla chat kameralı çet kameralı sohpet kızlarla çet chat gizli kamera güvenlik sistemleri kamera güvenlik kamerası cilt bakımı cilt bakım ürünleri ıslak mendil kolonyalı mendil kolonyalı mendil güvenlik kamerası gizli kamera kamera canlı sohbet sohpet sohbet sesli sesli chat sesli sohbet kameralı sohbet kameralı chat görüntülü chat görüntülü sohbet bayanlarla sohbet sesli muhabbet bayanlarla chat kızlarla sohbet bayan arkadaş görüntülü çet sesli çet sesli sohpet seslichat sesliçet kameralı sohpet kameralı çet kızlarla sohpet kızlarla çet sesli sohbet sesli sohbet sesli sohbet sesli chat sesli chat chat çet ek iş ek gelir mirc avşa adası avşa avşa adası avşa tatil tatil köyleri "Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr" Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr "Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr" "Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr" Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr özcan sarıca ile kurtlar vadisi pusu 3.sezon 1.seo yarışması özcan sarıca ile kurtlar vadisi pusu 3.sezon 1.seo yarışması aytug akdogan ödüllü 1. seo yarışması ve yurtta barış dünyada barış aytug akdogan ödüllü 1. seo yarışması ve yurtta barış dünyada barış "adtech ile reklam 2.0 dönemi başlıyor ve Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr r10.net seo yarışması" adtech ile reklam 2.0 dönemi başlıyor ve Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr r10.net seo yarışması adtech ile reklam 2.0 dönemi başlıyor ve Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr r10.net seo yarışması "adtech ile reklam 2.0 dönemi başlıyor ve Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr r10.net seo yarışması" "adtech ile reklam 2.0 dönemi başlıyor ve Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr r10.net seo yarışması" adtech ile reklam 2.0 dönemi başlıyor ve Trkycmhrytllbtpydrklcktr r10.net seo yarışması ıslak mendil ıslak mendil kolonyalı mendil kolonyalı mendil paketleme ambalajlama paket web tasarım seo refreshing towel perde tatil kozmetik haber joy türk radyo aşk haber video tatil tekstilkent yabancı personel çalışma izni



MyTechSis Otomobil Ödüllü Seo Yarışması


MyTechSis Otomobil Ödüllü Seo Yarışması


sohbet
sohbet
sohbet
chat
msn
kimsesiz
belediye baskanlari
belediye baskanlari
belediye baskanlarimiz
belediye baskanlarimiz
belediye baskanlarimiz
belediye baskanlarimiz
belediye baskanlarimiz
belediye baskanlarimiz
erotik resimler
senato adayları
millet vekili adaylari
belediye baskanları
komik fikralar
manzara resimleri
tente
sdfsdf (URL) said:
治疗大三阳幼儿感染乙肝病毒的前数年至十余年间,病毒和机体“和平共处”,血

清中表现为大三阳,因此大三阳也反映了机体中病毒在不断复制繁殖,而届时肝脏的损害通常较轻,有相当一部分被感染者,尤其是女性被感

染者,病毒可长期或终身和机体“和平共处”,如此我们称为“病毒携带者”,即机体长期携带了乙肝病毒,而肝脏损害较轻,可以生活到60

-70岁以上,没有明显症状,并不一定因肝脏疾病病故,他们主要起着传染源的作用。
脂肪肝是指由于各种原因引起的肝细胞内脂肪堆积过多的病变。脂肪性肝病正严重威胁国人

的健康,成为仅次于病毒性肝炎的第二大肝病,已被公认为隐蔽性肝硬化的常见原因。脂肪肝是一种常见的临床现象,而非一种独立的疾病。

其临床表现轻者无症状,重者病情凶猛。一般而言,脂肪肝属可逆性疾病,早期诊断并及时治疗常可恢复正常。正常人的肝内总脂量,约占肝

重的5%,内含磷脂、甘油三酯、脂酸、胆固醇及胆固醇脂。而患脂肪肝者,总脂量可达40%-50%,主要是甘油三酯及脂酸,而磷脂、胆固醇及胆

固醇脂只少量增加。
乙肝乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)引起的一种世界性疾病。发展中国家发病率高,据统计,全世界无症状乙

肝病毒携带者(HBsAg携带者)超过2.8亿,我国约占9300万。多数无症状,其中1/3出现肝损害的临床表现。目前我国有乙肝患者3000万。乙肝的

特点为起病较缓,以亚临床型及慢性型较常见。无黄疸型HBsAg持续阳性者易慢性化。本病主要通过血液、母婴和性接触进行传播。乙肝疫苗的

应用是预防和控制乙型肝炎的根本措施。
治疗乙肝
大三阳即是两对半检查中,表面抗原(HBsAg)、e抗原(HBeAg)和抗核杭体(HBcAb)为阳

性。幼儿感染乙肝病毒的前数年至十余年间,病毒和机体“和平共处”,血清中表现为大三阳,因此大三阳也反映了机体中病毒在不断复制繁殖,

而届时肝脏的损
乙肝小三阳
治疗脂肪肝
小三阳的治疗
Finnsense said:
There seems to be the assumption in this piece as well as many others that Radiohead are taking a loss in return for more exposure, good will and bigger concert audiences. This is just confused. Artists do not get more than a dollar or two for each album sold. Thus, if the average person pays £2.00 ($4.00) for this download, they make more than they would otherwise on music sales alone
M of Headingly said:
I think the 49 p is still charged to those who choose to pay 1 pence. If you pay 0 pence, no transaction is made. If a transaction is made, regardless of the amount, there is a surcharge of 49 pence.

Nevertheless, I can definitely see myself purchasing the CD when it becomes available.
Norman said:
Mobile payments appear to be the way forward - cut out the intermediary (visa, master etc) - who make big$$$ out of this. Of course, banks will also want a share - micropayments may be the way to go. Either way, all I would like to know is that if I donated $2, $1.75 should go to the artist and a small amount to the intermediary. If this can be achieved, RIAA will be screwed once for all.
Any mobile payment companies listening
Eliot Landrum said:
"And one more thing. It is very difficult to make big money in the digital space except for Google of course. Remember iTunes sells iPods not downloads."

Both statements are quite incorrect.

Google is NOT the only company making "big" money in the "digital space". See: eBay (profitable from Day 1), Amazon, Yahoo. Here's a Top 6 from Fortune: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/industries/Internet_Services_and_Retailing/1.html

Finally, iTunes makes quite a bit of money from music. It is a myth that they use it to sell iPods (but it is certainly quite useful, no doubt). See: http://daringfireball.net/2007/09/more_amazon_mp3_store
ladykier said:
radiohead's mistake was not having enough bandwidth to handle the traffic.But when this get's resolved it will be an ideal model for all artists who already have a following - like myself. Artists will be looking for web designers who can set up a similar model. if anyone knows of any programmers looking to build this model -please put them in touch with me- lady kier from deee-lite
at info@ladykier.com
Byron Anderson said:
EMI has recently appointed John Birt. The appointment is part of the plans Terra Firma has to make EMI "the world's most innovative and consumer-focused music company and the best home for musical talent." John Birt is expected to work specifically on Artist Relations at EMI with Edna Abad - head of North America and Caryn Thomlinson out of London. There may not be much work ahead for EMI to reach that goal as the previous management had already taken strides to improve artist relations, most clearly the April announcement that EMI-based tracks would no longer use Digital Rights Management technology to protect music from piracy. Additionally, EMI has long held a large roster of popular musicians, most notably several big 1960s era artists like The Beatles, The Rolling Stones, and The Beach Boys.

Enjoy the music.
Don Adams said:
If there were actually 1.3 million downloads and half (650,000) of those downloads were purchased at an averaged price of $8, they've made $5.2 million. Compare that to the artist making 1 to 2 dollars per album. They would have sell 2.6 to 5.2 million albums over a considerably longer period of time. That said, very few artist are currently selling anywhere near 2.6 to 5.2 million albums in a an entire year. Radioheads has dones this in a few days. This is and will continue to be a huge success for Radiohead and of course a huge loss for EMI.
Peter Kafka said:
Matt and Phil - Thanks for keeping me honest and forcing me to actually go through the process myself. You are indeed correct -- you don't need to give the band a penny to grab the album. If you do offer a penny or more, however, you'll end up paying the 45p charge. I've updated the story with the new (to me) information.
Phil said:
At the risk of disgracing my honor, I'll admit that I know, firsthand, you can get it for absolutely free. No 49 pence fee.
Michael Parkatti said:
Holy shizzer -- 1.3 is huge numbers for the first day of release. And I bet they would have done a lot more if their website wasn't crapped out most of the day (I didn't get through to download till later in the evening). Although Radiohead was built with the big label machinery, there are PLENTY of examples of bands that grew to general recognition without that machine (arcade fire, pavement, etc). It'll be interesting to see if this model continues to evolve. William Hung is trying his best ;) http://www.humblenarrator.com/2007/10/12/radioheads-pick-your-price-forces-hung-to-push-boundaries/
Peter Kafka said:
Matt, have you ordered a download? I haven't -- but my understanding is thatthey are charging a fee to cover the cost of the transaction, website, etc. If wrong, I'm happy to correct.
Matt said:
What minimum 49 pence price? No min exists. You can get it for 0 pence.
Marc Cohen said:
I think the issue is much bigger than the relevance of record labels. This is about whether it is still possible to make money from recorded music. Contrary to popular belief, digital technology makes it possible to make more from recorded music than ever before. "Don't sell the music - sell the time spent listening to the music." Whatever Radiohead made from giving away their album, it is a fraction of what they left on the table.

Check out the Ad-Supported Music Central blog:
http://ad-supported-music.blogspot.com/
Drew Robertson said:
There are two digital fixes being bandied about to save the music industry. 1) A super version of a subscription service (voluntary) that lets users do more things than they can through Rhapsody and Yahoo today (e.g. play on iPods) and 2) a music tax (mandatory) assessed on all cable or ISP customers just like the ESPN tax we pay today. I don't want to go through the logistical, political and accounting hassles inherent with each but there are several.

Here are two problems common to both. It becomes impossible to "promote". Although they'll have some kind of royalty structure, inevitably there will be a leveling of the stars with the serfs. How do you get kids to listen to the new Usher single on their PC or MP3 player? They've already paid what they're going to pay. Who will care? Good for me as the stuff I dislike (50cent, Nickelback) will be penalized in favor of the stuff I like (Marshall Crenshaw, Tom Verlaine.) But promotion is one of the two raison d'etre's of the labels. They can't run the ship on Aphex Twin and Roy Hargrove.

The other problem with these models is that they both preserve the "song" as the basic product of the recorded music business. The 3-5Mb MP3 just doesn't have that much economic value as a stand-alone product. (Madonna has recognized that and is redefining her core product as the concert.) But there are larger, lumpier, harder -to-file-share products the music industry can create -- digital ones at that. But they don't fit well with the super subscription or tax models.

And one more thing. It is very difficult to make big money in the digital space except for Google of course. Remember iTunes sells iPods not downloads.

Join the discussion