Estimating Financial Impact of iTunes/NBC: Small, For Now, But We Still Expect Reconciliation
What's at stake financially in the battle between NBC and Apple over video downloads? Right now, almost nothing. For the future, however, the precedents are very important.
Here are some back-of-the-envelope estimates:
Apple keeps about 30 cents or less when it sells a 99-cent song on iTunes. We believe a similar ratio applies to its $1.99 TV shows (if anyone can offer more detail, please do). So, we assume that when iTunes sells an episode of, say, Heroes, NBC Universal keeps about $1.44 and Apple about 55 cents. Forrester analyst James McQuivey estimates in WSJ ($) that Apple sold about 50 million video downloads in the first half of the year. NBC says it accounts for 40% of those sales (via the NYT), and Apple says it only accounts for 30% (via release). So call it 35%
REVENUE
Est. annual revenue for iTunes video sales: 100M x $1.99 = $200 million.
LESS: NBC portion: $200 million x 35% = $70 million
iTunes video revenue post NBC defection: $130 million
OPERATING PROFIT
Of the $70 million of NBC video revenue, we estimate that Apple keeps a bit less than a third, or $20 million, and pays about $50 million to NBC. With numbers this small, the impact on profitability isn't a huge concern. Most of NBC's cut probably drops to the bottom line (it only has to pay a handful of pennies to rights holders for each sale), while Apple probably does a bit better than break-even, as it does with music sales (bandwidth costs plus overhead plus transaction fees eat up most of the revenue).
The sums here are rounding errors for both companies. So why does it matter?
Apple's iTunes store exists primarily as a way to promote iPod sales (and, down the line, perhaps gizmos like the iPhone and Apple TV). The pitch is one-stop shopping: Come to us, and you'll find all the music, TV, etc. that you need, in one place, with one pricing scheme. It's simple and it works. Steve Jobs doesn't need the revenue that NBC generates. But he does need to make sure consumers can find whatever content they want at his store. If they have to go elsewhere for that content, that new video iPod may look less appealing.
Similarly, Jeff Zucker at NBC doesn't want to be locked into selling his product exclusively through Apple -- he can see how unhappy the music labels are about that arrangement. He'd like options -- like, say, Hulu. But walking away from Apple will be risky for him as well. For starters, no other company has proved it can equal Apple's expertise at providing a seamless experience.
This is an ugly spat for now. But expect it to end with a reconciliation.




Warhammer powerleveling
wow power leveling
Warhammer powerleveling
Warhammer powerlevel
Warhammer Gold
Aion powerleveling
Aion Gold
Good post thanks for sharing.
I like this site ;)
-----------
yüz maskesi
sivilce kremi
inci tozu
doğum çatlağı
figurin
zayiflama hapı
AIO交友愛情館,情人歡愉用品,美女視訊,情色交友,情人用品性哥,視訊交友,辣妹視訊,美女交友,性愛,嘟嘟成人網,按摩棒,震動按摩棒,微調按摩棒,情趣按摩棒,逼真按摩棒,G點,跳蛋,跳蛋,跳蛋,性感內衣,飛機杯,充氣娃娃,情趣娃娃,角色扮演,性感睡衣,後庭區,SM,潤滑液,情趣禮物,威而柔,香水,精油,芳香精油,自慰,自慰套,性感吊帶襪,情趣用品加盟,跳蛋情人娜娜,情人節禮物,情人節,吊帶襪,辣妹視訊,美女交友,情色交友,成人交友,視訊聊天室,美女視訊,視訊美女,情色視訊,免費視訊聊天,視訊交友,視訊聊天,AIO交友愛情館,嘟嘟成人網,成人貼圖,成人網站 AIO交友愛情館,情色,情色貼圖,情色文學,情色交友,色情聊天室,色情小說,七夕情人節,色情,情色視訊,情色電影,色情網站,辣妹視訊,視訊聊天室,情色視訊,免費視訊聊天,視訊聊天,美女視訊,視訊美女,美女交友,美女,情色交友,成人交友,自拍,本土自拍,情人視訊網,視訊交友90739,生日禮物,情色論壇,正妹牆
That said, the Networks and major Movie Studios have never been much for innovation. They had a good formula for making fortunes in the celluloid era, but don't seem to realize that the world is adopting a different entertainment construct. They are rapidly being left behind.
This means a huge increase in the number of video capable ipods. If it was $50M to NBC, it would be $150M in 2008. A business that treats $100M as a rounding error is going to have trouble with making its larger numbers.
NBC's actions amount to "We think Walmart has too much power. So we're pulling out of Walmart." Yeah, that's going to work.
Oh, and as much as NBC doesn't like being told what the price is, Apple is pretty savvy in this market in terms of knowing their consumers. And since they bear the per-transaction costs, they really have no incentive to underprice. The only difference is that Apple is embracing the future, not trying to slow it down.
At a higher bitrate I'd be happy to buy directly from iTunes and cut out the record industry in its entirety
We're tired of being ripped off by record labels and networks.
I buy products from itunes because it's reasonably priced and centrally located and I want to support the CREATORS so that they get paid.
I won't go elsewhere to pay ripoff prices. I'd rather just use torrent.
Artists would be smart to team directly with Itunes and cut out the labels.
The media companies should be rushing to team up with the last existing revenue generation model before YouTube/Miro/etc. run over what's left of old media's control.
NBC was trying to play hardball and they got spanked. Spin it to look bad for Apple as much as you like, but NBC is the one who comes out of this looking like the greedy 20th Century dinosaur with no regard for what consumers want. Consumers vote with their wallets, and they open those wallets in vast numbers for iPods and iTunes.
Except, there is no exclusivity! Selling videos through iTunes did not in any way impede NBCU from selling anywhere else. What you seem to imply is that NBCU wanted to stop Apple from selling more than their competitors and gaining market power.
Rhapsody makes payments to labels, delivering detailed tracking on which artists/albums/songs our subscribers have played, downloaded or purchased along with a check for the total. The labels are then responsible for making payments to their artists.
We also make payments to music publishers for the songs people listen to/buy through the service. As with the labels, the publishers are responsible for making payments directly to the artists.
So it's conceivable that artists get two checks for the music we offer through Rhapsody.